Chris De Sa

Satyen Kale, Jason D. Lee, Chris De Sa et al.

Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has been the method of choice for learning large-scale non-convex models. While a general analysis of when SGD works has been elusive, there has been a lot of recent progress in understanding the convergence of Gradient Flow (GF) on the population loss, partly due to the simplicity that a continuous-time analysis buys us. An overarching theme of our paper is providing general conditions under which SGD converges, assuming that GF on the population loss converges. Our main tool to establish this connection is a general converse Lyapunov like theorem, which implies the existence of a Lyapunov potential under mild assumptions on the rates of convergence of GF. In fact, using these potentials, we show a one-to-one correspondence between rates of convergence of GF and geometrical properties of the underlying objective. When these potentials further satisfy certain self-bounding properties, we show that they can be used to provide a convergence guarantee for Gradient Descent (GD) and SGD (even when the paths of GF and GD/SGD are quite far apart). It turns out that these self-bounding assumptions are in a sense also necessary for GD/SGD to work. Using our framework, we provide a unified analysis for GD/SGD not only for classical settings like convex losses, or objectives that satisfy PL / KL properties, but also for more complex problems including Phase Retrieval and Matrix sq-root, and extending the results in the recent work of Chatterjee 2022.

Gilad Turok, Chris De Sa, Volodymyr Kuleshov

Masked diffusion models (MDMs) generate text by iteratively selecting positions to unmask and then predicting tokens at those positions. Yet MDMs lack proper perplexity evaluation: the ELBO is a loose bound on likelihood under the training distribution, not the test-time distribution, while generative perplexity requires a biased external model and ignores diversity. To address this, we introduce the \textsc{DUEL} framework, which formalizes \emph{deterministic} position selection, unifying leading MDM sampling strategies. We prove \textbf{\textsc{DUEL} admits \emph{exact} likelihood computation} via a simple algorithm, evaluated under the same position selection used at test time. This \textbf{gives MDMs proper perplexity for the first time} -- the natural analogue of autoregressive perplexity. With proper perplexity in hand, we revisit key questions about MDMs. \textbf{MDMs are substantially better than previously thought}: the MDM-autoregressive perplexity gap shrinks by up to 32\% on in-domain data and 82\% on zero-shot benchmarks. \textsc{DUEL} enables the first principled comparison of fast, parallel samplers across compute budgets -- an analysis impossible with the ELBO and unreliable with generative perplexity -- identifying probability margin \citep{kim2025train} as a strong default. Finally, oracle search over position orderings reveals MDMs can far surpass autoregressive models -- achieving 36.47 vs.\ 52.11 perplexity on AG News -- demonstrating the ceiling of MDM performance has not yet been reached.

Tanmaey Gupta, Hayden Prairie, Xiaoxia Wu et al.

Quantization has emerged as a standard technique for accelerating inference for generative models by enabling faster low-precision computations and reduced memory transfers. Recently, GPU accelerators have added first-class support for microscaling Block Floating Point (BFP) formats. Standard BFP algorithms use a fixed scale based on the maximum magnitude of the block. We observe that this scale choice can be suboptimal with respect to quantization errors. In this work, we propose ScaleSearch, an alternative strategy for selecting these scale factors: using a fine-grained search leveraging the mantissa bits in microscaling formats to minimize the quantization error for the given distribution. ScaleSearch can be integrated with existing quantization methods such as Post Training Quantization and low-precision attention, and is shown to improve their performance. Additionally, we introduce ScaleSearchAttention, an accelerated NVFP4-based attention algorithm, which uses ScaleSearch and adapted prior techniques to ensure near-0 performance loss for causal language modeling. Experiments show that ScaleSearch reduces quantization error by 27% for NVFP4 and improves language model PTQ by up to 15 points for MATH500 (Qwen3-8B), while ScaleSearchAttention improves Wikitext-2 PPL by upto 0.77 points for Llama 3.1 70B. The proposed methods closely match baseline performance while providing quantization accuracy improvements.

Subham Sekhar Sahoo, Aaron Gokaslan, Chris De Sa et al.

Diffusion models have gained traction as powerful algorithms for synthesizing high-quality images. Central to these algorithms is the diffusion process, a set of equations which maps data to noise in a way that can significantly affect performance. In this paper, we explore whether the diffusion process can be learned from data. Our work is grounded in Bayesian inference and seeks to improve log-likelihood estimation by casting the learned diffusion process as an approximate variational posterior that yields a tighter lower bound (ELBO) on the likelihood. A widely held assumption is that the ELBO is invariant to the noise process: our work dispels this assumption and proposes multivariate learned adaptive noise (MULAN), a learned diffusion process that applies noise at different rates across an image. Specifically, our method relies on a multivariate noise schedule that is a function of the data to ensure that the ELBO is no longer invariant to the choice of the noise schedule as in previous works. Empirically, MULAN sets a new state-of-the-art in density estimation on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet and reduces the number of training steps by 50%. We provide the code, along with a blog post and video tutorial on the project page: https://s-sahoo.com/MuLAN

Jessica Zosa Forde, A. Feder Cooper, Kweku Kwegyir-Aggrey et al.

Algorithmic fairness has emphasized the role of biased data in automated decision outcomes. Recently, there has been a shift in attention to sources of bias that implicate fairness in other stages in the ML pipeline. We contend that one source of such bias, human preferences in model selection, remains under-explored in terms of its role in disparate impact across demographic groups. Using a deep learning model trained on real-world medical imaging data, we verify our claim empirically and argue that choice of metric for model comparison, especially those that do not take variability into account, can significantly bias model selection outcomes.