Xiangang Li

h-index1
2papers
1citation

2 Papers

10.7CLApr 10
Interactive ASR: Towards Human-Like Interaction and Semantic Coherence Evaluation for Agentic Speech Recognition

Peng Wang, Yanqiao Zhu, Zixuan Jiang et al.

Recent years have witnessed remarkable progress in automatic speech recognition (ASR), driven by advances in model architectures and large-scale training data. However, two important aspects remain underexplored. First, Word Error Rate (WER), the dominant evaluation metric for decades, treats all words equally and often fails to reflect the semantic correctness of an utterance at the sentence level. Second, interactive correction-an essential component of human communication-has rarely been systematically studied in ASR research. In this paper, we integrate these two perspectives under an agentic framework for interactive ASR. We propose leveraging LLM-as-a-Judge as a semantic-aware evaluation metric to assess recognition quality beyond token-level accuracy. Furthermore, we design an LLM-driven agent framework to simulate human-like multi-turn interaction, enabling iterative refinement of recognition outputs through semantic feedback. Extensive experiments are conducted on standard benchmarks, including GigaSpeech (English), WenetSpeech (Chinese), the ASRU 2019 code-switching test set. Both objective and subjective evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework in improving semantic fidelity and interactive correction capability. We will release the code to facilitate future research in interactive and agentic ASR.

1.4LGJan 26
FGGM: Fisher-Guided Gradient Masking for Continual Learning

Chao-Hong Tan, Qian Chen, Wen Wang et al.

Catastrophic forgetting impairs the continuous learning of large language models. We propose Fisher-Guided Gradient Masking (FGGM), a framework that mitigates this by strategically selecting parameters for updates using diagonal Fisher Information. FGGM dynamically generates binary masks with adaptive thresholds, preserving critical parameters to balance stability and plasticity without requiring historical data. Unlike magnitude-based methods such as MIGU, our approach offers a mathematically principled parameter importance estimation. On the TRACE benchmark, FGGM shows a 9.6% relative improvement in retaining general capabilities over supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and a 4.4% improvement over MIGU on TRACE tasks. Additional analysis on code generation tasks confirms FGGM's superior performance and reduced forgetting, establishing it as an effective solution.