CLDec 19, 2023Code
Coreference Graph Guidance for Mind-Map GenerationZhuowei Zhang, Mengting Hu, Yinhao Bai et al.
Mind-map generation aims to process a document into a hierarchical structure to show its central idea and branches. Such a manner is more conducive to understanding the logic and semantics of the document than plain text. Recently, a state-of-the-art method encodes the sentences of a document sequentially and converts them to a relation graph via sequence-to-graph. Though this method is efficient to generate mind-maps in parallel, its mechanism focuses more on sequential features while hardly capturing structural information. Moreover, it's difficult to model long-range semantic relations. In this work, we propose a coreference-guided mind-map generation network (CMGN) to incorporate external structure knowledge. Specifically, we construct a coreference graph based on the coreference semantic relationship to introduce the graph structure information. Then we employ a coreference graph encoder to mine the potential governing relations between sentences. In order to exclude noise and better utilize the information of the coreference graph, we adopt a graph enhancement module in a contrastive learning manner. Experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms all the existing methods. The case study further proves that our model can more accurately and concisely reveal the structure and semantics of a document. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Cyno2232/CMGN.
CLJun 18, 2024Code
UBench: Benchmarking Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Multiple Choice QuestionsXunzhi Wang, Zhuowei Zhang, Gaonan Chen et al.
Despite recent progress in systematic evaluation frameworks, benchmarking the uncertainty of large language models (LLMs) remains a highly challenging task. Existing methods for benchmarking the uncertainty of LLMs face three key challenges: the need for internal model access, additional training, or high computational costs. This is particularly unfavorable for closed-source models. To this end, we introduce UBench, a new benchmark for evaluating the uncertainty of LLMs. Unlike other benchmarks, UBench is based on confidence intervals. It encompasses 11,978 multiple-choice questions spanning knowledge, language, understanding, and reasoning capabilities. Based on this, we conduct extensive experiments. This includes comparisons with other advanced uncertainty estimation methods, the assessment of the uncertainty of 20 LLMs, and an exploration of the effects of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts, role-playing (RP) prompts, and temperature on model uncertainty. Our analysis reveals several crucial insights: 1) Our confidence interval-based methods are highly effective for uncertainty quantification; 2) Regarding uncertainty, outstanding open-source models show competitive performance versus closed-source models; 3) CoT and RP prompts present potential ways to improve model reliability, while the influence of temperature changes follows no universal rule. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/Cyno2232/UBENCH.