Joel Klein

Joel Klein, Rebecca Pelke, Roberto Laudani et al.

Computing-in-Memory (CIM) accelerators execute Matrix-Vector Multiplications (MVMs) in memory, making them a compelling solution for Machine Learning (ML) workloads. However, existing ML workload partitioning approaches for CIM accelerators do not fully account for Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) constraints such as limited memory, high write latency, and limited endurance. They also neglect parallelism, low-level architectural effects, or the Central Processing Unit (CPU) as a complementary compute resource. To address these limitations, we propose an Integer Linear Programming (ILP)-based workload partitioning framework for heterogeneous CPU-CIM systems. It minimizes end-to-end inference latency under RRAM constraints, captures parallelism, and combines empirical profiling with analytical models. Using our framework, heterogeneous CPU-CIM execution achieves speedups of up to 30.9x over CPU-only execution on an edge CPU and 7.3x over a high-performance CPU. A Design Space Exploration (DSE) yields further design insights for future CIM accelerators.

Rebecca Pelke, Joel Klein, Jose Cubero-Cascante et al.

Computing-in-Memory (CIM) accelerators are a promising solution for accelerating Machine Learning (ML) workloads, as they perform Matrix-Vector Multiplications (MVMs) on crossbar arrays directly in memory. Although the bit widths of the crossbar inputs and cells are very limited, most CIM compilers do not support quantization below 8 bit. As a result, a single MVM requires many compute cycles, and weights cannot be efficiently stored in a single crossbar cell. To address this problem, we propose a mixed-precision training and compilation framework for CIM architectures. The biggest challenge is the massive search space, that makes it difficult to find good quantization parameters. This is why we introduce a reinforcement learning-based strategy to find suitable quantization configurations that balance latency and accuracy. In the best case, our approach achieves up to a 2.48x speedup over existing state-of-the-art solutions, with an accuracy loss of only 0.086 %.