Zhaoyang Guan

Zhaoyang Guan, Huixi Cao, Ming Zhong et al.

Multi-agent large language model systems can tackle complex multi-step tasks by decomposing work and coordinating specialized behaviors. However, current coordination mechanisms typically rely on statically assigned roles and centralized controllers. As agent pools and task distributions evolve, these design choices can lead to inefficient routing, poor adaptability, and fragile fault recovery. We introduce Symphony-Coord, a task-local coordination framework with decentralized execution that transforms agent selection into an online multi-armed bandit problem. Instead of relying on a fixed task-to-role map, Symphony-Coord allows routing specializations to emerge from interaction and feedback. The framework employs a two-stage dynamic beacon protocol:(i) a lightweight candidate screening mechanism to limit communication and computation overhead; and (ii) an adaptive LinUCB selector that routes subtasks using context features derived from task requirements and agent states, updated through delayed post-execution feedback. Under candidate-conditional linear bandit assumptions, we prove sublinear regret bounds for the immediate-feedback selector and explicitly separate the deferred-update effects introduced by post-vote rewards. Validation through simulation experiments and real-world large language model benchmarks shows that Symphony-Coord improves task routing efficiency and recovery behavior under distribution shifts and agent failures.

Dexu Yu, Youhua Li, Zhaoyang Guan et al.

Agent skills have become a practical way to extend large language model agents, but the growing skill ecosystem still lacks a reliable way to judge whether a skill is worth deploying. Existing evaluation methods remain largely anchored to fixed task suites, assessing skills through performance on predefined tasks and environments. As skill marketplaces expand, this paradigm becomes inadequate: fixed suites can conflate a skill's marginal contribution with backbone strength and miss its value when tasks fall outside the skill's intended scope. We introduce SkillAudit, an end-to-end framework for skill-centered assessment that takes an arbitrary agent skill as input and automatically generates a comprehensive, multi-dimensional evaluation report spanning utility, efficiency/cost, and safety. SkillAudit focuses on the skill artifact itself and constructs capability-aligned evaluation tasks directly from the skill package. The generated tasks are conducted in isolated sandbox environments to collect execution evidence, followed by automated checks with LLM-based judging to produce auditable results. To dissect the agent skills, we propose the baseline comparison principle to measure utility and efficiency/cost, and introduce a two-stage detection paradigm combining static semantic analysis with dynamic runtime verification to assess safety risks. After scanning top-ranked real-world skill packages spanning 23 occupational categories, we found that over 7% of skills are at risky status.