Qihong Lu

Qihong Lu, Tan T. Nguyen, Qiong Zhang et al.

It has been proposed that, when processing a stream of events, humans divide their experiences in terms of inferred latent causes (LCs) to support context-dependent learning. However, when shared structure is present across contexts, it is still unclear how the "splitting" of LCs and learning of shared structure can be simultaneously achieved. Here, we present the Latent Cause Network (LCNet), a neural network model of LC inference. Through learning, it naturally stores structure that is shared across tasks in the network weights. Additionally, it represents context-specific structure using a context module, controlled by a Bayesian nonparametric inference algorithm, which assigns a unique context vector for each inferred LC. Across three simulations, we found that LCNet could 1) extract shared structure across LCs in a function learning task while avoiding catastrophic interference, 2) capture human data on curriculum effects in schema learning, and 3) infer the underlying event structure when processing naturalistic videos of daily events. Overall, these results demonstrate a computationally feasible approach to reconciling shared structure and context-specific structure in a model of LCs that is scalable from laboratory experiment settings to naturalistic settings.

Catherine Chen, Qihong Lu, Andre Beukers et al.

Through specific experiences, humans learn relationships underlying the structure of events in the world. Schema theory suggests that we organize this information in mental frameworks called "schemata," which represent our knowledge of the structure of the world. Generalizing knowledge of structural relationships to new situations requires role-filler binding, the ability to associate specific "fillers" with abstract "roles." For instance, when we hear the sentence "Alice ordered a tea from Bob," the role-filler bindings "Alice:customer," "tea:drink," and "Bob:barista" allow us to understand and make inferences about the sentence. We can perform these bindings for arbitrary fillers -- we understand this sentence even if we have never heard the names "Alice," "tea," or "Bob" before. In this work, we define a model as capable of performing role-filler binding if it can recall arbitrary fillers corresponding to a specified role, even when these pairings violate correlations seen during training. Previous work found that models can learn this ability when explicitly told what the roles and fillers are, or when given fillers seen during training. We show that networks with external memory can learn these relationships with fillers not seen during training and without explicitly labeled role-filler bindings, and show that analyses inspired by neural decoding can provide a means of understanding what the networks have learned.

Qihong Lu, Po-Hsuan Chen, Jonathan W. Pillow et al.

Different neural networks trained on the same dataset often learn similar input-output mappings with very different weights. Is there some correspondence between these neural network solutions? For linear networks, it has been shown that different instances of the same network architecture encode the same representational similarity matrix, and their neural activity patterns are connected by orthogonal transformations. However, it is unclear if this holds for non-linear networks. Using a shared response model, we show that different neural networks encode the same input examples as different orthogonal transformations of an underlying shared representation. We test this claim using both standard convolutional neural networks and residual networks on CIFAR10 and CIFAR100.