Mariano Nicolas Cruz-Bournazou

Nghia Duong-Trung, Stefan Born, Jong Woo Kim et al.

Machine learning (ML) is becoming increasingly crucial in many fields of engineering but has not yet played out its full potential in bioprocess engineering. While experimentation has been accelerated by increasing levels of lab automation, experimental planning and data modeling are still largerly depend on human intervention. ML can be seen as a set of tools that contribute to the automation of the whole experimental cycle, including model building and practical planning, thus allowing human experts to focus on the more demanding and overarching cognitive tasks. First, probabilistic programming is used for the autonomous building of predictive models. Second, machine learning automatically assesses alternative decisions by planning experiments to test hypotheses and conducting investigations to gather informative data that focus on model selection based on the uncertainty of model predictions. This review provides a comprehensive overview of ML-based automation in bioprocess development. On the one hand, the biotech and bioengineering community should be aware of the potential and, most importantly, the limitation of existing ML solutions for their application in biotechnology and biopharma. On the other hand, it is essential to identify the missing links to enable the easy implementation of ML and Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in valuable solutions for the bio-community.

Maxim Borisyak, Stefan Born, Peter Neubauer et al.

Inferring parameters of macro-kinetic growth models, typically represented by Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE), from the experimental data is a crucial step in bioprocess engineering. Conventionally, estimates of the parameters are obtained by fitting the mechanistic model to observations. Fitting, however, requires a significant computational power. Specifically, during the development of new bioprocesses that use previously unknown organisms or strains, efficient, robust, and computationally cheap methods for parameter estimation are of great value. In this work, we propose using Deep Neural Networks (NN) for directly predicting parameters of mechanistic models given observations. The approach requires spending computational resources for training a NN, nonetheless, once trained, such a network can provide parameter estimates orders of magnitude faster than conventional methods. We consider a training procedure that combines Neural Networks and mechanistic models. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed algorithms on data sampled from several mechanistic models used in bioengineering describing a typical industrial batch process and compare the proposed method, a typical gradient-based fitting procedure, and the combination of the two. We find that, while Neural Network estimates are slightly improved by further fitting, these estimates are measurably better than the fitting procedure alone.

Maxim Borisyak, Stefan Born, Peter Neubauer et al.

Cultivation experiments often produce sparse and irregular time series. Classical approaches based on mechanistic models, like Maximum Likelihood fitting or Monte-Carlo Markov chain sampling, can easily account for sparsity and time-grid irregularities, but most statistical and Machine Learning tools are not designed for handling sparse data out-of-the-box. Among popular approaches there are various schemes for filling missing values (imputation) and interpolation into a regular grid (alignment). However, such methods transfer the biases of the interpolation or imputation models to the target model. We show that Deep Set Neural Networks equipped with triplet encoding of the input data can successfully handle bio-process data without any need for imputation or alignment procedures. The method is agnostic to the particular nature of the time series and can be adapted for any task, for example, online monitoring, predictive control, design of experiments, etc. In this work, we focus on forecasting. We argue that such an approach is especially suitable for typical cultivation processes, demonstrate the performance of the method on several forecasting tasks using data generated from macrokinetic growth models under realistic conditions, and compare the method to a conventional fitting procedure and methods based on imputation and alignment.