Qingyuan Hu

Xiaonan Jing, Yi Zhang, Qingyuan Hu et al.

Twitter can be viewed as a data source for Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. The continuously updating data streams on Twitter make it challenging to trace real-time topic evolution. In this paper, we propose a framework for modeling fuzzy transitions of topic clusters. We extend our previous work on crisp cluster transitions by incorporating fuzzy logic in order to enrich the underlying structures identified by the framework. We apply the methodology to both computer generated clusters of nouns from tweets and human tweet annotations. The obtained fuzzy transitions are compared with the crisp transitions, on both computer generated clusters and human labeled topic sets.

Xiaonan Jing, Qingyuan Hu, Yi Zhang et al.

Twitter serves as a data source for many Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. It can be challenging to identify topics on Twitter due to continuous updating data stream. In this paper, we present an unsupervised graph based framework to identify the evolution of sub-topics within two weeks of real-world Twitter data. We first employ a Markov Clustering Algorithm (MCL) with a node removal method to identify optimal graph clusters from temporal Graph-of-Words (GoW). Subsequently, we model the clustering transitions between the temporal graphs to identify the topic evolution. Finally, the transition flows generated from both computational approach and human annotations are compared to ensure the validity of our framework.

Qingyuan Hu, Yi Zhang, Kanishka Misra et al.

Natural Language Inference (NLI) or Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) is the task of predicting the entailment relation between a pair of sentences (premise and hypothesis). This task has been described as a valuable testing ground for the development of semantic representations, and is a key component in natural language understanding evaluation benchmarks. Models that understand entailment should encode both, the premise and the hypothesis. However, experiments by Poliak et al. revealed a strong preference of these models towards patterns observed only in the hypothesis, based on a 10 dataset comparison. Their results indicated the existence of statistical irregularities present in the hypothesis that bias the model into performing competitively with the state of the art. While recast datasets provide large scale generation of NLI instances due to minimal human intervention, the papers that generate them do not provide fine-grained analysis of the potential statistical patterns that can bias NLI models. In this work, we analyze hypothesis-only models trained on one of the recast datasets provided in Poliak et al. for word-level patterns. Our results indicate the existence of potential lexical biases that could contribute to inflating the model performance.