Paul François

Nacer Eddine Boukacem, Allen Leary, Robin Thériault et al.

Networks in machine learning offer examples of complex high-dimensional dynamical systems reminiscent of biological systems. Here, we study the learning dynamics of Generalized Hopfield networks, which permit a visualization of internal memories. These networks have been shown to proceed through a 'feature-to-prototype' transition, as the strength of network nonlinearity is increased, wherein the learned, or terminal, states of internal memories transition from mixed to pure states. Focusing on the prototype learning dynamics of the internal memories we observe a strong resemblance to the canalized, or low-dimensional, dynamics of cells as they differentiate within a Waddingtonian landscape. Dynamically, we demonstrate that learning in a Generalized Hopfield Network proceeds through sequential 'splits' in memory space. Furthermore, order of splitting is interpretable and reproducible. The dynamics between the splits are canalized in the Waddington sense -- robust to variations in detailed aspects of the system. In attempting to make the analogy a rigorous equivalence, we study smaller subsystems that exhibit similar properties to the full system. We combine analytical calculations with numerical simulations to study the dynamical emergence of the feature-to-prototype transition, and the behaviour of splits in the landscape, saddles points, visited during learning. We exhibit regimes where saddles appear and disappear through saddle-node bifurcations, qualitatively changing the distribution of learned memories as the strength of the nonlinearity is varied -- allowing us to systematically investigate the mechanisms that underlie the emergence of Waddingtonian dynamics. Memories can thus differentiate in a predictive and controlled way, revealing new bridges between experimental biology, dynamical systems theory, and machine learning.

Thomas J. Rademaker, Emmanuel Bengio, Paul François

Machine learning algorithms can be fooled by small well-designed adversarial perturbations. This is reminiscent of cellular decision-making where ligands (called antagonists) prevent correct signalling, like in early immune recognition. We draw a formal analogy between neural networks used in machine learning and models of cellular decision-making (adaptive proofreading). We apply attacks from machine learning to simple decision-making models, and show explicitly the correspondence to antagonism by weakly bound ligands. Such antagonism is absent in more nonlinear models, which inspired us to implement a biomimetic defence in neural networks filtering out adversarial perturbations. We then apply a gradient-descent approach from machine learning to different cellular decision-making models, and we reveal the existence of two regimes characterized by the presence or absence of a critical point for the gradient. This critical point causes the strongest antagonists to lie close to the decision boundary. This is validated in the loss landscapes of robust neural networks and cellular decision-making models, and observed experimentally for immune cells. For both regimes, we explain how associated defence mechanisms shape the geometry of the loss landscape, and why different adversarial attacks are effective in different regimes. Our work connects evolved cellular decision-making to machine learning, and motivates the design of a general theory of adversarial perturbations, both for in vivo and in silico systems.