Esha Singh

2papers

2 Papers

1.7MLMar 5
The Inductive Bias of Convolutional Neural Networks: Locality and Weight Sharing Reshape Implicit Regularization

Tongtong Liang, Esha Singh, Rahul Parhi et al.

We study how architectural inductive bias reshapes the implicit regularization induced by the edge-of-stability phenomenon in gradient descent. Prior work has established that for fully connected networks, the strength of this regularization is governed solely by the global input geometry; consequently, it is insufficient to prevent overfitting on difficult distributions such as the high-dimensional sphere. In this paper, we show that locality and weight sharing fundamentally change this picture. Specifically, we prove that provided the receptive field size $m$ remains small relative to the ambient dimension $d$, these networks generalize on spherical data with a rate of $n^{-\frac{1}{6} +O(m/d)}$, a regime where fully connected networks provably fail. This theoretical result confirms that weight sharing couples the learned filters to the low-dimensional patch manifold, thereby bypassing the high dimensionality of the ambient space. We further corroborate our theory by analyzing the patch geometry of natural images, showing that standard convolutional designs induce patch distributions that are highly amenable to this stability mechanism, thus providing a systematic explanation for the superior generalization of convolutional networks over fully connected baselines.

1.4LGFeb 11
Divide and Learn: Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization at Scale

Esha Singh, Dongxia Wu, Chien-Yi Yang et al.

Multi-objective combinatorial optimization seeks Pareto-optimal solutions over exponentially large discrete spaces, yet existing methods sacrifice generality, scalability, or theoretical guarantees. We reformulate it as an online learning problem over a decomposed decision space, solving position-wise bandit subproblems via adaptive expert-guided sequential construction. This formulation admits regret bounds of $O(d\sqrt{T \log T})$ depending on subproblem dimensionality \(d\) rather than combinatorial space size. On standard benchmarks, our method achieves 80--98\% of specialized solvers performance while achieving two to three orders of magnitude improvement in sample and computational efficiency over Bayesian optimization methods. On real-world hardware-software co-design for AI accelerators with expensive simulations, we outperform competing methods under fixed evaluation budgets. The advantage grows with problem scale and objective count, establishing bandit optimization over decomposed decision spaces as a principled alternative to surrogate modeling or offline training for multi-objective optimization.