Anil Kumar Singh

CL
h-index16
10papers
2,216citations
Novelty28%
AI Score26

10 Papers

0.5CLMar 3, 2023
Exploiting Language Relatedness in Machine Translation Through Domain Adaptation Techniques

Amit Kumar, Rupjyoti Baruah, Ajay Pratap et al.

One of the significant challenges of Machine Translation (MT) is the scarcity of large amounts of data, mainly parallel sentence aligned corpora. If the evaluation is as rigorous as resource-rich languages, both Neural Machine Translation (NMT) and Statistical Machine Translation (SMT) can produce good results with such large amounts of data. However, it is challenging to improve the quality of MT output for low resource languages, especially in NMT and SMT. In order to tackle the challenges faced by MT, we present a novel approach of using a scaled similarity score of sentences, especially for related languages based on a 5-gram KenLM language model with Kneser-ney smoothing technique for filtering in-domain data from out-of-domain corpora that boost the translation quality of MT. Furthermore, we employ other domain adaptation techniques such as multi-domain, fine-tuning and iterative back-translation approach to compare our novel approach on the Hindi-Nepali language pair for NMT and SMT. Our approach succeeds in increasing ~2 BLEU point on multi-domain approach, ~3 BLEU point on fine-tuning for NMT and ~2 BLEU point on iterative back-translation approach.

0.2CLNov 21, 2018Code
Multi Task Deep Morphological Analyzer: Context Aware Joint Morphological Tagging and Lemma Prediction

Saurav Jha, Akhilesh Sudhakar, Anil Kumar Singh

The ambiguities introduced by the recombination of morphemes constructing several possible inflections for a word makes the prediction of syntactic traits in Morphologically Rich Languages (MRLs) a notoriously complicated task. We propose the Multi Task Deep Morphological analyzer (MT-DMA), a character-level neural morphological analyzer based on multitask learning of word-level tag markers for Hindi and Urdu. MT-DMA predicts a set of six morphological tags for words of Indo-Aryan languages: Parts-of-speech (POS), Gender (G), Number (N), Person (P), Case (C), Tense-Aspect-Modality (TAM) marker as well as the Lemma (L) by jointly learning all these in one trainable framework. We show the effectiveness of training of such deep neural networks by the simultaneous optimization of multiple loss functions and sharing of initial parameters for context-aware morphological analysis. Exploiting character-level features in phonological space optimized for each tag using multi-objective genetic algorithm, our model establishes a new state-of-the-art accuracy score upon all seven of the tasks for both the languages. MT-DMA is publicly accessible: code, models and data are available at https://github.com/Saurav0074/morph_analyzer.

0.5CLNov 30, 2021
A Comparative Study of Transformers on Word Sense Disambiguation

Avi Chawla, Nidhi Mulay, Vikas Bishnoi et al.

Recent years of research in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have witnessed dramatic growth in training large models for generating context-aware language representations. In this regard, numerous NLP systems have leveraged the power of neural network-based architectures to incorporate sense information in embeddings, resulting in Contextualized Word Embeddings (CWEs). Despite this progress, the NLP community has not witnessed any significant work performing a comparative study on the contextualization power of such architectures. This paper presents a comparative study and an extensive analysis of nine widely adopted Transformer models. These models are BERT, CTRL, DistilBERT, OpenAI-GPT, OpenAI-GPT2, Transformer-XL, XLNet, ELECTRA, and ALBERT. We evaluate their contextualization power using two lexical sample Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) tasks, SensEval-2 and SensEval-3. We adopt a simple yet effective approach to WSD that uses a k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) classification on CWEs. Experimental results show that the proposed techniques also achieve superior results over the current state-of-the-art on both the WSD tasks

0.3CLDec 30, 2020
Language Identification of Devanagari Poems

Priyankit Acharya, Aditya Ku. Pathak, Rakesh Ch. Balabantaray et al.

Language Identification is a very important part of several text processing pipelines. Extensive research has been done in this field. This paper proposes a procedure for automatic language identification of poems for poem analysis task, consisting of 10 Devanagari based languages of India i.e. Angika, Awadhi, Braj, Bhojpuri, Chhattisgarhi, Garhwali, Haryanvi, Hindi, Magahi, and Maithili. We collated corpora of poems of varying length and studied the similarity of poems among the 10 languages at the lexical level. Finally, various language identification systems based on supervised machine learning and deep learning techniques are applied and evaluated.

1.1CLApr 29, 2020
Linguistic Resources for Bhojpuri, Magahi and Maithili: Statistics about them, their Similarity Estimates, and Baselines for Three Applications

Rajesh Kumar Mundotiya, Manish Kumar Singh, Rahul Kapur et al.

Corpus preparation for low-resource languages and for development of human language technology to analyze or computationally process them is a laborious task, primarily due to the unavailability of expert linguists who are native speakers of these languages and also due to the time and resources required. Bhojpuri, Magahi, and Maithili, languages of the Purvanchal region of India (in the north-eastern parts), are low-resource languages belonging to the Indo-Aryan (or Indic) family. They are closely related to Hindi, which is a relatively high-resource language, which is why we compare with Hindi. We collected corpora for these three languages from various sources and cleaned them to the extent possible, without changing the data in them. The text belongs to different domains and genres. We calculated some basic statistical measures for these corpora at character, word, syllable, and morpheme levels. These corpora were also annotated with parts-of-speech (POS) and chunk tags. The basic statistical measures were both absolute and relative and were exptected to indicate of linguistic properties such as morphological, lexical, phonological, and syntactic complexities (or richness). The results were compared with a standard Hindi corpus. For most of the measures, we tried to the corpus size the same across the languages to avoid the effect of corpus size, but in some cases it turned out that using the full corpus was better, even if sizes were very different. Although the results are not very clear, we try to draw some conclusions about the languages and the corpora. For POS tagging and chunking, the BIS tagset was used to manually annotate the data. The POS tagged data sizes are 16067, 14669 and 12310 sentences, respectively, for Bhojpuri, Magahi and Maithili. The sizes for chunking are 9695 and 1954 sentences for Bhojpuri and Maithili, respectively.

31.0CLApr 12, 2019Code
IIT (BHU) Varanasi at MSR-SRST 2018: A Language Model Based Approach for Natural Language Generation

Shreyansh Singh, Avi Chawla, Ayush Sharma et al.

This paper describes our submission system for the Shallow Track of Surface Realization Shared Task 2018 (SRST'18). The task was to convert genuine UD structures, from which word order information had been removed and the tokens had been lemmatized, into their correct sentential form. We divide the problem statement into two parts, word reinflection and correct word order prediction. For the first sub-problem, we use a Long Short Term Memory based Encoder-Decoder approach. For the second sub-problem, we present a Language Model (LM) based approach. We apply two different sub-approaches in the LM Based approach and the combined result of these two approaches is considered as the final output of the system.

0.5CLNov 21, 2018Code
Learning cross-lingual phonological and orthagraphic adaptations: a case study in improving neural machine translation between low-resource languages

Saurav Jha, Akhilesh Sudhakar, Anil Kumar Singh

Out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words can pose serious challenges for machine translation (MT) tasks, and in particular, for low-resource language (LRL) pairs, i.e., language pairs for which few or no parallel corpora exist. Our work adapts variants of seq2seq models to perform transduction of such words from Hindi to Bhojpuri (an LRL instance), learning from a set of cognate pairs built from a bilingual dictionary of Hindi--Bhojpuri words. We demonstrate that our models can be effectively used for language pairs that have limited parallel corpora; our models work at the character level to grasp phonetic and orthographic similarities across multiple types of word adaptations, whether synchronic or diachronic, loan words or cognates. We describe the training aspects of several character level NMT systems that we adapted to this task and characterize their typical errors. Our method improves BLEU score by 6.3 on the Hindi-to-Bhojpuri translation task. Further, we show that such transductions can generalize well to other languages by applying it successfully to Hindi -- Bangla cognate pairs. Our work can be seen as an important step in the process of: (i) resolving the OOV words problem arising in MT tasks, (ii) creating effective parallel corpora for resource-constrained languages, and (iii) leveraging the enhanced semantic knowledge captured by word-level embeddings to perform character-level tasks.

32.0CLAug 21, 2018
Language Identification in Code-Mixed Data using Multichannel Neural Networks and Context Capture

Soumil Mandal, Anil Kumar Singh

An accurate language identification tool is an absolute necessity for building complex NLP systems to be used on code-mixed data. Lot of work has been recently done on the same, but there's still room for improvement. Inspired from the recent advancements in neural network architectures for computer vision tasks, we have implemented multichannel neural networks combining CNN and LSTM for word level language identification of code-mixed data. Combining this with a Bi-LSTM-CRF context capture module, accuracies of 93.28% and 93.32% is achieved on our two testing sets.

0.3CLDec 20, 2017
Ethical Questions in NLP Research: The (Mis)-Use of Forensic Linguistics

Anil Kumar Singh, Akhilesh Sudhakar

Ideas from forensic linguistics are now being used frequently in Natural Language Processing (NLP), using machine learning techniques. While the role of forensic linguistics was more benign earlier, it is now being used for purposes which are questionable. Certain methods from forensic linguistics are employed, without considering their scientific limitations and ethical concerns. While we take the specific case of forensic linguistics as an example of such trends in NLP and machine learning, the issue is a larger one and present in many other scientific and data-driven domains. We suggest that such trends indicate that some of the applied sciences are exceeding their legal and scientific briefs. We highlight how carelessly implemented practices are serving to short-circuit the due processes of law as well breach ethical codes.

3.2IRJan 19, 2015
Responding to Retrieval: A Proposal to Use Retrieval Information for Better Presentation of Website Content

C Ravindranath Chowdary, Anil Kumar Singh, Anil Nelakanti

Retrieval and content management are assumed to be mutually exclusive. In this paper we suggest that they need not be so. In the usual information retrieval scenario, some information about queries leading to a website (due to `hits' or `visits') is available to the server administrator of the concerned website. This information can used to better present the content on the website. Further, we suggest that some more information can be shared by the retrieval system with the content provider. This will enable the content provider (any website) to have a more dynamic presentation of the content that is in tune with the query trends, without violating the privacy of the querying user. The result will be a better synchronization between retrieval systems and content providers, with the purpose of improving the user's web search experience. This will also give the content provider a say in this process, given that the content provider is the one who knows much more about the content than the retrieval system. It also means that the content presentation may change in response to a query. In the end, the user will be able to find the relevant content more easily and quickly.