Bastian Rieck

Johannes S. Schmidt, Martin Carrasco, Ernst Röell et al.

Despite an ever-increasing interest in topological deep learning models that target higher-order datasets, there is no consensus on how to evaluate such models. This is exacerbated by the fact that topological objects permit operations, such as structural refinements, that are not appropriate for graph data. In this work, we extend MANTRA, a benchmark dataset containing manifold triangulations, to a larger class of manifolds with more diverse homeomorphism types. We show that, unlike prior claims, both graph neural networks (GNNs) and higher-order message passing (HOMP) methods can saturate the benchmark. However, we find that this is contingent on the right representation and feature assignment, emphasizing their importance in baseline models. We thus provide a novel evaluation protocol based on representational diversity and triangulation refinement. Surprisingly, we find no indication that existing models are capable of generalizing beyond the combinatorial structure of the data. This points towards a research gap in developing models that understand topological structure independent of scale. Our work thus provides the necessary scaffolding to evaluate future models and enable the development of topology-aware inductive biases.

Christian Koke, Yuesong Shen, Abhishek Saroha et al.

We show that contrary to conventional wisdom in the community, graph neural networks (GNNs) are not continuous with respect to all natural modes of graph convergence. As a result, GNNs may generate substantially different latent representations for graphs that are very similar. In particular they assign vastly different latent embeddings to graphs that represent the same underlying object at different resolution scales. We trace this failure of continuity back to a structural obstruction arising from commonly used information-propagation schemes. Building on this insight we then derive a principled modification to standard GNN architectures which equips models with continuity across scales. The proposed modification enables consistent integration of distinct resolutions and reliable generalization between them. We systematically validate our theoretical findings in a wide range of numerical experiments.

Nithisha Raghavaraju, Barbara Giunti, Bastian Rieck

Chatbots have become increasingly prevalent across various domains, offering automated assistance in many areas, especially mental health support. The training is done using extremely large datasets, which are sometimes not available in very specific domains. Moreover, it would sometimes be ideal to train the chatbot with personal information about the patients, which, of course, cannot be done on shared servers since it would violate patient confidentiality. Hence, being able to improve the performance of a chatbot, possibly trained locally and on a restricted dataset, without having to increase the dataset itself, would be extremely beneficial. In this work, we will enhance the input datasets using persistent homology (PH) vectorizations computed from the raw datasets themselves. Then we will compare, across several metrics, the performance of multiple chatbot models with or without the PH enhancement. Our experiments suggest that, while at times the PH enhancement is not particularly beneficial, it sometimes brings remarkable advantages for virtually no cost.

Richard von Moos, Mathieu Alain, Bastian Rieck

Progress on graph foundation models is hindered by benchmark practices that conflate the contributions of node features and graph structure, making it hard to tell whether a model actually learns from connectivity, or whether it even needs to. We propose addressing this using graph invariants, i.e., permutation-invariant, task-agnostic structural descriptors that serve as a diagnostic framework for graph benchmarks. We show that (i) invariants are more expressive than standard GNNs, (ii) invariants characterize structural heterogeneity within and across benchmark datasets, (iii) invariants predict multi-task performance, and (iv) simple invariant-based models are competitive with, and sometimes exceed, transformer and message-passing baselines across 26 datasets. Our results suggest that expressivity is not the main driver of predictive performance, and that on tasks where structure matters, a non-trainable structural proxy often matches trained message-passing models. We thus posit that invariant baselines should become a standard for evaluating whether structure is required for a task and whether a model picks up on it, serving as a stepping stone towards graph foundation models.

Katharina Limbeck, Nadja Häusermann, Martin Carrasco et al.

Graph-level representations are crucial tools for characterising structural differences between graphs. However, comparing graphs with different cardinalities, even when sampled from the same underlying distribution, remains challenging. Unsupervised tasks in particular require interpretable, scalable, and reliable size-aware graph representations. Our work addresses these issues by tracking the structural diversity of a graph across coarsening levels. The resulting graph embeddings, which we denote diversity curves, are interpretable by construction, efficient, and directly comparable across coarsening hierarchies. Specifically, we track the spread of graphs, a novel isometry invariant that is inherently well-suited for encoding the metric diversity and geometry of graphs. We utilise edge contraction coarsening and prove that this improves expressivity, thus leading to more powerful graph-level representations than structural descriptors alone. Demonstrating their utility over a range of baseline methods in practice, we use diversity curves to (i) cluster and visualise simulated graphs across varying sizes, (ii) distinguish the geometry of single-cell graphs, (iii) compare the structure of molecular graph datasets, and (iv) characterise geometric shapes.

Elena Xinyi Wang, Bastian Rieck

The Weisfeiler--Lehman (WL) test and its simplicial extension (SWL) characterize the combinatorial expressivity of message passing networks, but they are blind to geometry, i.e., meshes with identical connectivity but different embeddings are indistinguishable. We introduce the Geometric Simplicial Weisfeiler--Lehman (GSWL) test, which incorporates vertex coordinates into color refinement for geometric simplicial complexes. In addition, we show that (i) the expressivity of geometry-aware simplicial message passing schemes is bounded above by GSWL, and (ii) that there exist parameters such that the discriminating power of GSWL is matched by these schemes on any fixed finite family of geometric simplicial complexes. Combined with the Euler Characteristic Transform (ECT), a complete invariant for geometric simplicial complexes, this yields a geometric expressivity characterization together with an approximation framework. Experiments on synthetic and mesh datasets serve to validate our theory, showing a clear hierarchy from combinatorial to geometry-aware models.

Bastian Rieck

After a somewhat rocky start, geometry and topology have established a foothold in machine learning. Message passing, either on graphs or higher-order complexes, is one of the main drivers of geometric deep learning, and paradigms that were once considered to be firmly in the realm of the abstract-like sheaves-have been "tamed" to serve as novel inductive biases for model architectures in topological deep learning. The veritable diversity of models, however, is in stark contrast to the scarcity of suitable benchmark datasets. As a result, researchers often resort to lifting existing graph datasets to include higher-order information. In this opinion paper, I want to encourage the community to also source new datasets, which may be used to prop up the foundations of our research field.