Haidong Zhao

Haidong Zhao, Nikolaos Georgantas

Machine learning (ML) inference serving systems can schedule requests to improve GPU utilization and to meet service level objectives (SLOs) or deadlines. However, improving GPU utilization may compromise latency-sensitive scheduling, as concurrent tasks contend for GPU resources and thereby introduce interference. Given that interference effects introduce unpredictability in scheduling, neglecting them may compromise SLO or deadline satisfaction. Nevertheless, existing interference prediction approaches remain limited in several respects, which may restrict their usefulness for scheduling. First, they are often coarse-grained, which ignores runtime co-location dynamics and thus restricts their accuracy in interference prediction. Second, they tend to use a static prediction model, which may not effectively cope with different workload characteristics. To this end, we evaluate the potential limitations of existing interference prediction approaches and outline our ongoing work toward achieving efficient ML inference scheduling.

Haidong Zhao, Nikolaos Georgantas

Machine learning (ML) inference serving systems host deep neural network (DNN) models and schedule incoming inference requests across deployed GPUs. However, limited support for task prioritization and insufficient latency estimation under concurrent execution may restrict their applicability in on-premises scenarios. We present \emph{Strait}, a serving system designed to enhance deadline satisfaction for dual-priority inference traffic under high GPU utilization. To improve latency estimation, Strait models potential contention during data transfer and accounts for kernel execution interference through an adaptive prediction model. By drawing on these predictions, it performs priority-aware scheduling to deliver differentiated handling. Evaluation results under intense workloads suggest that Strait reduces deadline violations for high-priority tasks by 1.02 to 11.18 percentage points while incurring acceptable costs on low-priority tasks. Compared to software-defined preemption approaches, Strait also exhibits more equitable performance.