4.3CLApr 18
A Community-Based Approach for Stance Distribution and Argument OrganizationRudra Ranajee Saha, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan, Raymond T. Ng
The proliferation of online debate platforms and social media has led to an unprecedented volume of argumentative content on controversial topics from multiple perspectives. While this wealth of perspectives offers opportunities for developing critical thinking and breaking filter bubbles (Pariser 2011), the sheer volume and complexity of arguments make it challenging for readers to synthesize and comprehend diverse viewpoints effectively. We present an unsupervised graph-based approach for community-based argument organization that helps users navigate and understand complex argumentative landscapes. Our system analyzes collections of topic-focused articles and constructs a rich interaction graph by capturing multiple relationship types between arguments: topic similarity, semantic coherence, shared keywords, and common entities. We then employ community detection to identify argument communities that reveal homogeneous and heterogeneous viewpoint distributions. The detected communities are simplified through strategic graph operations to present users with digestible, yet comprehensive summaries of key argumentative patterns. Our approach requires no training data and can effectively process hundreds of articles while preserving nuanced relationships between arguments. Experimental results demonstrate our system's ability to identify meaningful argument communities and present them in an interpretable manner, facilitating users' understanding of complex socio-political debates.
8.8CLApr 19
A Multi-Agent Approach for Claim Verification from Tabular Data DocumentsRudra Ranajee Saha, Laks V. S. Lakshmanan, Raymond T. Ng
We present a novel approach for claim verification from tabular data documents. Recent LLM-based approaches either employ complex pretraining/fine-tuning or decompose verification into subtasks, often lacking comprehensive explanations and generalizability. To address these limitations, we propose a Multi-Agentic framework for Claim verification (MACE) consisting of three specialized agents: Planner, Executor, and Verifier. Instead of elaborate finetuning, each agent employs a zero-shot Chain-of-Thought setup to perform its tasks. MACE produces interpretable verification traces, with the Planner generating explicit reasoning strategies, the Executor providing detailed computation steps, and the Verifier validating the logic. Experiments demonstrate that MACE achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on two datasets and performs on par with the best models on two others, while achieving 80--100\% of best performance with substantially smaller models: 27--92B parameters versus 235B. This combination of competitive performance, memory efficiency, and transparent reasoning highlights our framework's effectiveness.
0.9CVOct 26, 2019
Wavelets to the Rescue: Improving Sample Quality of Latent Variable Deep Generative ModelsPrashnna K Gyawali, Rudra Saha, Linwei Wang et al.
Variational Autoencoders (VAE) are probabilistic deep generative models underpinned by elegant theory, stable training processes, and meaningful manifold representations. However, they produce blurry images due to a lack of explicit emphasis over high-frequency textural details of the images, and the difficulty to directly model the complex joint probability distribution over the high-dimensional image space. In this work, we approach these two challenges with a novel wavelet space VAE that uses the decoder to model the images in the wavelet coefficient space. This enables the VAE to emphasize over high-frequency components within an image obtained via wavelet decomposition. Additionally, by decomposing the complex function of generating high-dimensional images into inverse wavelet transformation and generation of wavelet coefficients, the latter becomes simpler to model by the VAE. We empirically validate that deep generative models operating in the wavelet space can generate images of higher quality than the image (RGB) space counterparts. Quantitatively, on benchmark natural image datasets, we achieve consistently better FID scores than VAE based architectures and competitive FID scores with a variety of GAN models for the same architectural and experimental setup. Furthermore, the proposed wavelet-based generative model retains desirable attributes like disentangled and informative latent representation without losing the quality in the generated samples.
8.7CVDec 10, 2018
Spatial Knowledge Distillation to aid Visual ReasoningSomak Aditya, Rudra Saha, Yezhou Yang et al.
For tasks involving language and vision, the current state-of-the-art methods tend not to leverage any additional information that might be present to gather relevant (commonsense) knowledge. A representative task is Visual Question Answering where large diagnostic datasets have been proposed to test a system's capability of answering questions about images. The training data is often accompanied by annotations of individual object properties and spatial locations. In this work, we take a step towards integrating this additional privileged information in the form of spatial knowledge to aid in visual reasoning. We propose a framework that combines recent advances in knowledge distillation (teacher-student framework), relational reasoning and probabilistic logical languages to incorporate such knowledge in existing neural networks for the task of Visual Question Answering. Specifically, for a question posed against an image, we use a probabilistic logical language to encode the spatial knowledge and the spatial understanding about the question in the form of a mask that is directly provided to the teacher network. The student network learns from the ground-truth information as well as the teachers prediction via distillation. We also demonstrate the impact of predicting such a mask inside the teachers network using attention. Empirically, we show that both the methods improve the test accuracy over a state-of-the-art approach on a publicly available dataset.