James Asikin Cheung

Nelvin Tan, Yaowen Zhang, James Asikin Cheung et al.

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming useful in many domains due to their impressive abilities that arise from large training datasets and large model sizes. However, research on LLM-based approaches to document inconsistency detection is relatively limited. We address this gap by investigating evidence extraction capabilties of LLMs for document inconsistency detection. To this end, we introduce new comprehensive evidence-extraction metrics and a redact-and-retry framework with constrained filtering that substantially improves evidence extraction performance over other prompting methods. We support our approach with strong experimental results and release a new semi-synthetic dataset for evaluating evidence extraction.

Nelvin Tan, James Asikin Cheung, Yu-Ching Shih et al.

Large language models (LLMs) are becoming useful in many domains due to their impressive abilities that arise from large training datasets and large model sizes. More recently, they have been shown to be very effective in textual classification tasks, motivating the need to explain the LLMs' decisions. Motivated by practical constrains where LLMs are black-boxed and LLM calls are expensive, we study how incorporating counterfactuals into LLM reasoning can affect the LLM's ability to identify the top words that have contributed to its classification decision. To this end, we introduce a framework called the decision changing rate that helps us quantify the importance of the top words in classification. Our experimental results show that using counterfactuals can be helpful.