Jianmin Wu

Wenyu Zhang, Guoliang You, Tianlun et al.

Coding agents are increasingly used as application builders, yet many evaluations still focus on source code, repository-level tests, or intermediate traces rather than the delivered application. We introduce WebGameBench, a requirement-to-application benchmark that evaluates whether coding agents can turn a frozen Structured WebGame Specification into a browser-accessible game. Browser-native games provide a compact but behavior-dense testbed: even simple games require coordinated input handling, spatial mapping, rule execution, state transitions, terminal conditions, restart behavior, and visible feedback. In WebGameBench, each generated artifact is built, served, and exposed as a browser-accessible application under a unified deployment protocol. A runtime evaluator then interacts with the delivered game in a real browser and assigns a three-way label: EXCELLENT, USABLE, or UNUSABLE. On a human-reviewed subset, the runtime label is broadly aligned with human gameplay review under the Usable-rate criterion. Across 111 tasks, 12 coding agents, and 14 evaluation configurations, WebGameBench separates current systems: the best configuration reaches a 76.9% usable rate but only a 20.2% excellent rate. This gap shows that crossing the minimum playable-delivery threshold is still far from complete requirement satisfaction. To our knowledge, WebGameBench is the first requirement-to-application benchmark for browser-native game delivery that validates delivered-application runtime labels against independent human gameplay review under the Usable-rate criterion.

Yucheng Zeng, Shupeng Li, Daxiang Dong et al.

Progress in software-engineering agents is increasingly constrained by the scarcity of executable, scalable, and realistic data for training and evaluation. This scarcity stems from three fundamental challenges in existing pipelines: environments are brittle and difficult to reproduce across languages; synthesizing realistic, system-level bugs at scale is computationally expensive; and existing data predominantly consists of short-horizon repairs, failing to capture long-horizon competencies like architectural consistency. We introduce \textbf{SWE-Hub}, an end-to-end system that operationalizes the data factory abstraction by unifying environment automation, scalable synthesis, and diverse task generation into a coherent production stack. At its foundation, the \textbf{Env Agent} establishes a shared execution substrate by automatically converting raw repository snapshots into reproducible, multi-language container environments with standardized interfaces. Built upon this substrate, \textbf{SWE-Scale} engine addresses the need for high-throughput generation, combining cross-language code analysis with cluster-scale validation to synthesize massive volumes of localized bug-fix instances. \textbf{Bug Agent} generates high-fidelity repair tasks by synthesizing system-level regressions involving cross-module dependencies, paired with user-like issue reports that describe observable symptoms rather than root causes. Finally, \textbf{SWE-Architect} expands the task scope from repair to creation by translating natural-language requirements into repository-scale build-a-repo tasks. By integrating these components, SWE-Hub establishes a unified production pipeline capable of continuously delivering executable tasks across the entire software engineering lifecycle.

Yucheng Zeng, Weipeng Lu, Linyun Liu et al.

The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) from static instruction-followers to autonomous agents necessitates operating within complex, stateful environments to achieve precise state-transition objectives. However, this paradigm is bottlenecked by data scarcity, as existing tool-centric reverse-synthesis pipelines fail to capture the rigorous logic of real-world applications. We introduce \textbf{LOGIGEN}, a logic-driven framework that synthesizes verifiable training data based on three core pillars: \textbf{Hard-Compiled Policy Grounding}, \textbf{Logic-Driven Forward Synthesis}, and \textbf{Deterministic State Verification}. Specifically, a Triple-Agent Orchestration is employed: the \textbf{Architect} compiles natural-language policy into database constraints to enforce hard rules; the \textbf{Set Designer} initializes boundary-adjacent states to trigger critical policy conflicts; and the \textbf{Explorer} searches this environment to discover causal solution paths. This framework yields a dataset of 20,000 complex tasks across 8 domains, where validity is strictly guaranteed by checking exact state equivalence. Furthermore, we propose a verification-based training protocol where Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on verifiable trajectories establishes compliance with hard-compiled policy, while Reinforcement Learning (RL) guided by dense state-rewards refines long-horizon goal achievement. On $τ^2$-Bench, LOGIGEN-32B(RL) achieves a \textbf{79.5\% success rate}, substantially outperforming the base model (40.7\%). These results demonstrate that logic-driven synthesis combined with verification-based training effectively constructs the causally valid trajectories needed for next-generation agents.