Xi Chen

Zixuan Xu, Tiancheng He, Huahui Yi et al.

Vision-language models remain susceptible to multimodal jailbreaks and over-refusal because safety hinges on both visual evidence and user intent, while many alignment pipelines supervise only the final response. To address this, we present SaFeR-ToolKit, which formalizes safety decision-making as a checkable protocol. Concretely, a planner specifies a persona, a Perception $\to$ Reasoning $\to$ Decision tool set, and a constrained transition graph, while a responder outputs a typed key-value tool trace before the final answer. To make the protocol reliably followed in practice, we train a single policy with a three-stage curriculum (SFT $\to$ DPO $\to$ GRPO), where GRPO directly supervises tool usage beyond answer-level feedback. Our contributions are two-fold: I. Dataset. The first tool-based safety reasoning dataset, comprising 31,654 examples (SFT 6k, DPO 18.6k, GRPO 6k) plus 1k held-out evaluation. II. Experiments. On Qwen2.5-VL, SaFeR-ToolKit significantly improves Safety/Helpfulness/Reasoning Rigor on 3B (29.39/45.04/4.98 $\to$ 84.40/71.13/78.87) and 7B (53.21/52.92/19.26 $\to$ 86.34/80.79/85.34), while preserving general capabilities (3B: 58.67 $\to$ 59.21; 7B: 66.39 $\to$ 66.81). Codes are available at https://github.com/Duebassx/SaFeR_ToolKit.

Siwei Zhang, Yun Xiong, Xi Chen et al.

Agentic Reinforcement Learning (Agentic RL) has shown remarkable potential in large language model-based (LLM) agents. These works can empower LLM agents to tackle complex tasks via multi-step, tool-integrated reasoning. However, an inherent limitation of existing Agentic RL methods is their reliance on a pure on-policy paradigm for exploration, restricting exploration to the agent's self-generated outputs and preventing the discovery of new reasoning perspectives for further improvement. While recent efforts incorporate auxiliary off-policy signals to enhance exploration, they typically utilize full off-policy trajectories for trajectory-level policy estimation, overlooking the necessity for the fine-grained, step-level exploratory dynamics within agentic rollout. In this paper, we revisit exploration in Agentic RL and propose Retrieval-Augmented Policy Optimization (RAPO), a novel RL framework that introduces retrieval to explicitly expand exploration during training. To achieve this, we decompose the Agentic RL training process into two phases: (i) Hybrid-policy Agentic Rollout, and (ii) Retrieval-aware Policy Optimization. Specifically, we propose a Hybrid-policy Agentic Rollout strategy, which allows the agents to continuously reason over the retrieved off-policy step-level traces. It dynamically extends the reasoning receptive field of agents, enabling broader exploration conditioned on external behaviors. Subsequently, we introduce the Retrieval-aware Policy Optimization mechanism, which calibrates the policy gradient estimation with retrieval reward and importance shaping, stabilizing training and prioritizing retrieval-illuminating exploration. Extensive experiments show that RAPO achieves an +5.0% average gain on fourteen datasets across three agentic reasoning tasks, while delivering 1.2x faster training efficiency.

Zihang Zeng, Jiaquan Zhang, Pengze Li et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate potentials for automating scientific code generation but face challenges in reliability, error propagation in multi-agent workflows, and evaluation in domains with ill-defined success metrics. We present a Bayesian adversarial multi-agent framework specifically designed for AI for Science (AI4S) tasks in the form of a Low-code Platform (LCP). Three LLM-based agents are coordinated under the Bayesian framework: a Task Manager that structures user inputs into actionable plans and adaptive test cases, a Code Generator that produces candidate solutions, and an Evaluator providing comprehensive feedback. The framework employs an adversarial loop where the Task Manager iteratively refines test cases to challenge the Code Generator, while prompt distributions are dynamically updated using Bayesian principles by integrating code quality metrics: functional correctness, structural alignment, and static analysis. This co-optimization of tests and code reduces dependence on LLM reliability and addresses evaluation uncertainty inherent to scientific tasks. LCP also streamlines human-AI collaboration by translating non-expert prompts into domain-specific requirements, bypassing the need for manual prompt engineering by practitioners without coding backgrounds. Benchmark evaluations demonstrate LCP's effectiveness in generating robust code while minimizing error propagation. The proposed platform is also tested on an Earth Science cross-disciplinary task and demonstrates strong reliability, outperforming competing models.