Charuvahan Adhivarahan

Yash Turkar, Pranay Meshram, Christo Aluckal et al.

Advancements in sensors, algorithms, and compute hardware have made 3D perception feasible in real time. Current methods to compare and evaluate the quality of a 3D model, such as Chamfer, Hausdorff, and Earth-Mover's distance, are uni-dimensional and have limitations, including an inability to capture coverage, local variations in density and error, and sensitivity to outliers. In this paper, we propose an evaluation framework for point clouds (Empir3D) that consists of four metrics: resolution to quantify the ability to distinguish between individual parts in the point cloud, accuracy to measure registration error, coverage to evaluate the portion of missing data, and artifact score to characterize the presence of artifacts. Through detailed analysis, we demonstrate the complementary nature of each of these dimensions and the improvements they provide compared to the aforementioned uni-dimensional measures. Furthermore, we illustrate the utility of Empir3D by comparing our metrics with uni-dimensional metrics for two 3D perception applications (SLAM and point cloud completion). We believe that Empir3D advances our ability to reason about point clouds and helps better debug 3D perception applications by providing a richer evaluation of their performance. Our implementation of Empir3D, custom real-world datasets, evaluations on learning methods, and detailed documentation on how to integrate the pipeline will be made available upon publication.

Vaishali Maheshkar, Aadarsh Anantha Ramakrishnan, Charuvahan Adhivarahan et al.

According to the EPA, only 25% of waste is recycled, and just 60% of U.S. municipalities offer curbside recycling. Plastics fare worse, with a recycling rate of only 8%; an additional 16% is incinerated, while the remaining 76% ends up in landfills. The low plastic recycling rate stems from contamination, poor economic incentives, and technical difficulties, making efficient recycling a challenge. To improve recovery, automated sorting plays a critical role. Companies like AMP Robotics and Greyparrot utilize optical systems for sorting, while Materials Recovery Facilities (MRFs) employ Near-Infrared (NIR) sensors to detect plastic types. Modern optical sorting uses advances in computer vision such as object recognition and instance segmentation, powered by machine learning. Two-stage detectors like Mask R-CNN use region proposals and classification with deep backbones like ResNet. Single-stage detectors like YOLO handle detection in one pass, trading some accuracy for speed. While such methods excel under ideal conditions with a large volume of labeled training data, challenges arise in realistic scenarios, emphasizing the need to further examine the efficacy of optic detection for automated sorting. In this study, we compiled novel datasets totaling 20,000+ images from varied sources. Using both public and custom machine learning pipelines, we assessed the capabilities and limitations of optical recognition for sorting. Grad-CAM, saliency maps, and confusion matrices were employed to interpret model behavior. We perform this analysis on our custom trained models from the compiled datasets. To conclude, our findings are that optic recognition methods have limited success in accurate sorting of real-world plastics at MRFs, primarily because they rely on physical properties such as color and shape.