Ati Priya Bajaj

Junmin Zhu, Siyu Liu, Jie Hu et al.

Directed fuzzing steers fuzzers toward user-defined sink functions to identify vulnerabilities, but it frequently fails to trigger crashes even after long campaigns. We identify two challenges that prevent directed fuzzers from exposing crashes: incomplete static analysis of indirect calls, which leaves reachable paths invisible to distance-based guidance, and lack of semantic guidance for crash preconditions, which blind mutation cannot satisfy within practical time budgets. A natural intervention point is the initial seed corpus: seeds that encode the right control-flow path and satisfy key crash preconditions shift fuzzing from blind exploration to local refinement. Existing seed generation approaches address neither: grammar-based and format-driven methods produce structurally valid inputs with no sink awareness, while LLM-based methods either lack sink targeting or inherit static analysis limitations through one-shot prompting. We present SeedSmith, an agentic LLM pipeline that replicates a security analyst's workflow: starting from a sink, it iteratively explores the codebase, resolves indirect calls, identifies crash preconditions, and synthesizes concrete inputs that satisfy them. Because SeedSmith operates as a seed generation front-end, its seeds are fuzzer-agnostic and improve any downstream mutation-based fuzzer without modification. On Magma, fuzzers using SeedSmith seeds achieve geometric mean crash-time speedups of 11.51 times (AFL++) to 14.66 times (AFLGo) over default seeds. On ARVO, SeedSmith enables fuzzers to trigger 16 previously unreachable bugs spanning 10 projects with diverse input formats.

Ashwin Sudhir, Zion Leonahenahe Basque, Wil Gibbs et al.

In the ever-evolving battle against malware, binary obfuscation techniques are a formidable barrier to effective analysis by both human security analysts and automated systems. In particular, virtualization or VM-based obfuscation is one of the strongest protection mechanisms that evade automated analysis. Despite widespread use of virtualization, existing automated deobfuscation techniques suffer from three major drawbacks. First, they only work on execution traces, which prevents them from recovering all logic in an obfuscated binary. Second, they depend on dynamic symbolic execution, which is expensive and does not scale in practice. Third, they cannot generate "well-formed" code, which prevents existing binary decompilers from generating human-friendly output. This paper introduces PUSHAN, a novel and generic technique for deobfuscating virtualization-obfuscated binaries while overcoming the limitations of existing techniques. PUSHAN is trace-free and avoids path-constraint accumulation by using VPC-sensitive, constraint-free symbolic emulation to recover a complete CFG of the virtualized function. It is the first approach that also decompiles the protected code into high-quality C pseudocode to enable effective analysis. Crucially, PUSHAN circumvents reliance on path satisfiability, a known NP-hard problem that hampers scalability. We evaluate PUSHAN on more than 1,000 binaries, including targets protected by academic state of the art (Tigress) and commercial-strength obfuscators VMProtect and Themida. PUSHAN successfully deobfuscates these binaries, retrieves their complete CFGs, and decompiles them to C pseudocode. We further demonstrate applicability by analyzing a previously unanalyzed VMProtect-obfuscated malware sample from VirusTotal, where our decompiled output enables LLM-assisted code simplification, reuse, and program understanding.

Hulin Wang, Zion Leonahenahe Basque, Jie Hu et al.

Recent LLM-based systems have made automated vulnerability repair increasingly practical, but two challenges remain. First, without strong signals about where a bug originates, repair agents drift toward shallow edits that silence the observed failure while leaving the underlying defect unresolved. Second, finding the root cause for bugs is hard: even developers familiar with the codebase frequently produce fixes that address symptoms rather than the root cause, and LLM-based agents, operating with noisier context and less program understanding, are no exception. We present Kumushi, a root-cause-driven patching agent that addresses both challenges by combining diversified dynamic fault localization with evidence-weighted ranking to focus the LLM on the code most relevant to the defect. To rigorously measure whether Kumushi produces genuinely better patches, we also introduce a two-tier patch quality metric that pairs automated oracle validation with structured expert assessment of patches. Evaluated on 178 C/C++ vulnerabilities, Kumushi substantially outperforms prior specialized repair agents under automated evaluation while matching a frontier commercial coding agent. Expert assessment then reveals differences that oracles cannot: Kumushi produces more root-cause fixes and fewer superficial patches, and is preferred in the majority of decisive pairwise comparisons. Together, these results demonstrate that progress in automated vulnerability repair requires not only stronger patching systems, but also richer evaluation methods capable of distinguishing genuine fixes from oracle-passing ones.