1.4CVNov 30, 2022
From Actions to Events: A Transfer Learning Approach Using Improved Deep Belief NetworksMateus Roder, Jurandy Almeida, Gustavo H. de Rosa et al. · microsoft-research
In the last decade, exponential data growth supplied machine learning-based algorithms' capacity and enabled their usage in daily-life activities. Additionally, such an improvement is partially explained due to the advent of deep learning techniques, i.e., stacks of simple architectures that end up in more complex models. Although both factors produce outstanding results, they also pose drawbacks regarding the learning process as training complex models over large datasets are expensive and time-consuming. Such a problem is even more evident when dealing with video analysis. Some works have considered transfer learning or domain adaptation, i.e., approaches that map the knowledge from one domain to another, to ease the training burden, yet most of them operate over individual or small blocks of frames. This paper proposes a novel approach to map the knowledge from action recognition to event recognition using an energy-based model, denoted as Spectral Deep Belief Network. Such a model can process all frames simultaneously, carrying spatial and temporal information through the learning process. The experimental results conducted over two public video dataset, the HMDB-51 and the UCF-101, depict the effectiveness of the proposed model and its reduced computational burden when compared to traditional energy-based models, such as Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Deep Belief Networks.
2.0LGOct 20, 2023
Feature Selection and Hyperparameter Fine-tuning in Artificial Neural Networks for Wood Quality ClassificationMateus Roder, Leandro Aparecido Passos, João Paulo Papa et al.
Quality classification of wood boards is an essential task in the sawmill industry, which is still usually performed by human operators in small to median companies in developing countries. Machine learning algorithms have been successfully employed to investigate the problem, offering a more affordable alternative compared to other solutions. However, such approaches usually present some drawbacks regarding the proper selection of their hyperparameters. Moreover, the models are susceptible to the features extracted from wood board images, which influence the induction of the model and, consequently, its generalization power. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the problem of simultaneously tuning the hyperparameters of an artificial neural network (ANN) as well as selecting a subset of characteristics that better describes the wood board quality. Experiments were conducted over a private dataset composed of images obtained from a sawmill industry and described using different feature descriptors. The predictive performance of the model was compared against five baseline methods as well as a random search, performing either ANN hyperparameter tuning and feature selection. Experimental results suggest that hyperparameters should be adjusted according to the feature set, or the features should be selected considering the hyperparameter values. In summary, the best predictive performance, i.e., a balanced accuracy of $0.80$, was achieved in two distinct scenarios: (i) performing only feature selection, and (ii) performing both tasks concomitantly. Thus, we suggest that at least one of the two approaches should be considered in the context of industrial applications.
4.2LGJul 31, 2020
Rethinking Default Values: a Low Cost and Efficient Strategy to Define HyperparametersRafael Gomes Mantovani, André Luis Debiaso Rossi, Edesio Alcobaça et al.
Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been increasingly applied to problems from several different areas. Despite their growing popularity, their predictive performance is usually affected by the values assigned to their hyperparameters (HPs). As consequence, researchers and practitioners face the challenge of how to set these values. Many users have limited knowledge about ML algorithms and the effect of their HP values and, therefore, do not take advantage of suitable settings. They usually define the HP values by trial and error, which is very subjective, not guaranteed to find good values and dependent on the user experience. Tuning techniques search for HP values able to maximize the predictive performance of induced models for a given dataset, but have the drawback of a high computational cost. Thus, practitioners use default values suggested by the algorithm developer or by tools implementing the algorithm. Although default values usually result in models with acceptable predictive performance, different implementations of the same algorithm can suggest distinct default values. To maintain a balance between tuning and using default values, we propose a strategy to generate new optimized default values. Our approach is grounded on a small set of optimized values able to obtain predictive performance values better than default settings provided by popular tools. After performing a large experiment and a careful analysis of the results, we concluded that our approach delivers better default values. Besides, it leads to competitive solutions when compared to tuned values, making it easier to use and having a lower cost. We also extracted simple rules to guide practitioners in deciding whether to use our new methodology or a HP tuning approach.
A meta-learning recommender system for hyperparameter tuning: predicting when tuning improves SVM classifiersRafael Gomes Mantovani, André Luis Debiaso Rossi, Edesio Alcobaça et al.
For many machine learning algorithms, predictive performance is critically affected by the hyperparameter values used to train them. However, tuning these hyperparameters can come at a high computational cost, especially on larger datasets, while the tuned settings do not always significantly outperform the default values. This paper proposes a recommender system based on meta-learning to identify exactly when it is better to use default values and when to tune hyperparameters for each new dataset. Besides, an in-depth analysis is performed to understand what they take into account for their decisions, providing useful insights. An extensive analysis of different categories of meta-features, meta-learners, and setups across 156 datasets is performed. Results show that it is possible to accurately predict when tuning will significantly improve the performance of the induced models. The proposed system reduces the time spent on optimization processes, without reducing the predictive performance of the induced models (when compared with the ones obtained using tuned hyperparameters). We also explain the decision-making process of the meta-learners in terms of linear separability-based hypotheses. Although this analysis is focused on the tuning of Support Vector Machines, it can also be applied to other algorithms, as shown in experiments performed with decision trees.
Better Trees: An empirical study on hyperparameter tuning of classification decision tree induction algorithmsRafael Gomes Mantovani, Tomáš Horváth, André L. D. Rossi et al.
Machine learning algorithms often contain many hyperparameters (HPs) whose values affect the predictive performance of the induced models in intricate ways. Due to the high number of possibilities for these HP configurations and their complex interactions, it is common to use optimization techniques to find settings that lead to high predictive performance. However, insights into efficiently exploring this vast space of configurations and dealing with the trade-off between predictive and runtime performance remain challenging. Furthermore, there are cases where the default HPs fit the suitable configuration. Additionally, for many reasons, including model validation and attendance to new legislation, there is an increasing interest in interpretable models, such as those created by the Decision Tree (DT) induction algorithms. This paper provides a comprehensive approach for investigating the effects of hyperparameter tuning for the two DT induction algorithms most often used, CART and C4.5. DT induction algorithms present high predictive performance and interpretable classification models, though many HPs need to be adjusted. Experiments were carried out with different tuning strategies to induce models and to evaluate HPs' relevance using 94 classification datasets from OpenML. The experimental results point out that different HP profiles for the tuning of each algorithm provide statistically significant improvements in most of the datasets for CART, but only in one-third for C4.5. Although different algorithms may present different tuning scenarios, the tuning techniques generally required few evaluations to find accurate solutions. Furthermore, the best technique for all the algorithms was the IRACE. Finally, we found out that tuning a specific small subset of HPs is a good alternative for achieving optimal predictive performance.