Antonio del Rio Chanona

Abdullah Bahamdan, Emma Pajak, John D. Hedengren et al.

Converting process sketches into executable simulation models remains a major bottleneck in process systems engineering, requiring substantial manual effort and simulator-specific expertise. Recent advances in generative AI have improved both engineering-diagram interpretation and LLM-assisted flowsheet generation, but these remain largely disconnected: diagram-understanding methods often stop at extracted graphs, while text-to-simulation workflows assume structured inputs rather than raw visual artifacts. To bridge this gap, we present an end-to-end multi-agent large language model system that converts process diagrams directly into executable Aspen HYSYS flowsheets. The framework decomposes the task into three coordinated layers: diagram parsing and interpretation, simulation model synthesis, and multi-level validation. Specialized agents handle visual interpretation, graph-based intermediate representation construction, code generation for the HYSYS COM interface, execution, and structural verification. We evaluate the framework on four chemical engineering case studies of increasing complexity, from a simple desalting process to an industrial aromatic production flowsheet with multiple recycle loops. The system produces executable HYSYS models in all cases, achieving complete structural fidelity on the two simpler cases and strong performance on the more complex ones, with connection consistency above 0.93 and stream consistency above 0.96. These results demonstrate a viable end-to-end sketch-to-simulation workflow while highlighting remaining challenges in dense recycle structures, implicit diagram semantics, and simulator-interface constraints.

Matthew Marsh, Benoît Chachuat, Antonio del Rio Chanona

Machine Learning is becoming more prevalent in science and engineering, but many approaches do not provide meaningful uncertainty estimates and predictions may also violate known physical knowledge. We propose a Bayesian framework to embed linear relationships across inputs and outputs into the learning process, whilst characterizing full predictive uncertainty over both the model parameters and the domain knowledge. We evaluated our method on learning the single particle battery model subject to voltage and energy balances, showing its ability to provide reduced credible intervals and constraint violations compared to standard Bayesian neural networks based on variational inference.

Friedrich Hastedt, Dongda Zhang, Antonio del Rio Chanona

Current computer-aided synthesis planning (CASP) methods often treat retrosynthesis as solved once a single feasible route is identified, focusing primarily on convergence or shortest-path metrics. This view is misaligned with real-world practice, where chemists must balance competing objectives such as cost, sustainability, toxicity, and overall yield. To address this, we formulate synthesis planning as a multi-objective search problem and introduce MORetro*, an algorithm that generates a Pareto front of synthesis routes to explicitly capture trade-offs among user-defined criteria. MORetro* uses weighted scalarization and BO-informed sampling to efficiently navigate the combinatorial search space and prioritize promising trade-offs. Building on multi-objective A*-search, we provide optimality guarantees showing that, for a fixed single-step model, MORetro* recovers the true Pareto front. Across multiple retrosynthesis benchmarks, MORetro* produces diverse, high-quality Pareto fronts, uncovering solutions overlooked by single-objective approaches and better aligning CASP outputs with industrial decision-making.

Matthew Marsh, Benoit Chachuat, Antonio del Rio Chanona

Machine learning models are increasingly used to model chemical process systems, yet they often lack principled uncertainty quantification and mechanisms to enforce physical constraints. We propose a probabilistic neural network framework that guarantees satisfaction of linear equality constraints within a given tolerance, while capturing aleatoric uncertainty. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, our formulation demonstrates improved predictive accuracy, uncertainty calibration, and adherence to constraints on reduced data. It also demonstrates competitive performance, but with significantly faster training times when evaluated on large data regimes. We evaluated this on two batch reactor case studies, enforcing mass balances.

Samuel Stricker, Claus Wirnsperger, Alessandro Butté et al.

This work presents an extension to Pareto Front Guided Sampling (PFGS), a Human-in-the-Loop (HitL) Bayesian Optimization (BO) framework in which Gaussian process (GP) surrogate-derived quantities are reformulated as objectives of a multi-objective optimization problem, and the resulting Pareto front is exposed to a domain expert for interactive candidate selection rather than returning a single automated recommendation. The framework is extended in two directions: constrained optimization is addressed by incorporating the posterior probability of satisfying output specification limits as an explicit Pareto objective, computed analytically from the GP posterior distribution; robust optimization is addressed by a Monte Carlo sampling strategy that estimates expected lower-confidence performance over a user-defined variability of input perturbations, capturing performance degradation under likely implementation deviations. The resulting multi-dimensional Pareto representation renders trade-offs between predicted performance, model uncertainty, probabilistic constraint satisfaction, and input robustness simultaneously visible through pairwise two-dimensional projections on an interactive dashboard, enabling selection criteria to be iteratively refined as the surrogate model improves and development objectives evolve. The framework is showcased on an eight-dimensional fed-batch Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell culture simulator demonstrating systematic identification of high-performing, feasibility-compliant, and perturbation-resilient operating conditions, and illustrating how expert-defined requirements provide a principled stopping criterion and support informed allocation of experimental resources.