2.9NAJun 19
QVaR: a Quantum Variational Regularization method for Linear Inverse ProblemsSiiri Rautio, Hjørdis Schlüter, Andreas Hauptmann et al.
We present a tailored framework for solving regularized linear inverse problems using quantum optimization methods. By discretizing the solution space and encoding data fidelity and regularization terms into quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models, we formulate both Tikhonov- and sparsity-promoting regularized inverse problems within a unified quantum optimization framework. We further introduce a notion of quantum sensitivity that characterizes the effect of perturbations arising from approximate quantum evolution and discretization. We derive bounds relating these perturbations to stability properties of the underlying inverse problem, thereby establishing a theoretical connection between quantum solution variability and classical notions of ill-posedness. The framework is extended to variational inverse problems through wavelet-based representations and complemented by reduced-order modeling strategies in both parameter and Hamiltonian spaces to mitigate current hardware limitations. Numerical experiments on simulated and physical quantum hardware indicate that the resulting low-energy solution distributions retain information about the underlying inverse problem, while also revealing the limitations imposed by finite-time evolution, discretization, and hardware noise.
1.4APMar 28
Bayesian Formulation of Acousto-Electric Tomography and Quantified Uncertainty in Limited ViewHjørdis Schlüter, Babak Maboudi Afkham
Acousto-electric tomography (AET) is a hybrid imaging modality that combines electrical impedance tomography with focused ultrasound perturbations to obtain interior power density measurements, which provide additional information that can enhance the stability of conductivity reconstruction. In this work, we study the AET inverse problem within a Bayesian framework and compare statistical reconstruction with analytical approaches. The unknown conductivity is modeled as a random field, and inference is based on the posterior distribution conditioned on the measurements. We consider likelihood constructions based on both L1- and L2-type data misfit norms and establish Bayesian well-posedness for both formulations within the framework of Stuart (2010). Numerical experiments investigate the performance of the Bayesian method from noisy power density measurements using the L1 and L2 likelihood functions and a smooth prior and a piecewise-constant prior for different limited view configurations, including severely limited boundary access. In particular, we demonstrate that small inclusions near the accessible boundary can be reconstructed from AET data corresponding to a single EIT measurement, and we quantify reconstruction uncertainty through posterior statistics.