Marton Laszlo Ambrus

Marton Laszlo Ambrus, Xiao Liu, Stuart Hillmansen et al.

Power-constrained 25kV AC railway sections, particularly under degraded feeding, are protected today by blunt, section-wide power limits that penalise every train irrespective of whether it contributes to the binding condition. This paper presents a real-time, location-aware controller that restores the electrical feasibility of a feeding section with minimal impact on the timetable: it curtails only the trains that bind, where and when they bind, evaluating feasibility and per-train available power online with a solver-free estimate as an in-loop surrogate for the full power flow. Because the estimate is accurate on average but slightly optimistic at the binding instants, the controller screens with a small voltage margin, and a full multi-conductor power-flow solver confirms the restored feasibility. The resulting selective-curtailment policy is delivered through a cloud-to-edge connected driver advisory system. On a representative GB 25kV corridor under outage feeding, solver-selected to be infeasible uncontrolled yet restorable, the controller is compared against the uncontrolled case, the incumbent static limit, and an offline genetic-algorithm optimum, with every feasibility figure solver-validated. The static limit restores feasibility at a large journey-time cost by throttling the whole section; the location-aware controller restores the same feasibility at one thirtieth of that cost by advising a single train, and matches the offline optimum's solution in about a second and a half against the optimiser's minute. Aggregate peak demand is unmoved, because the active constraint is local far-field voltage rather than gross demand. All claims are relative to the baselines on a representative corridor; a specific-route deployment study is future work.

Marton Laszlo Ambrus, Xiao Liu, Stuart Hillmansen et al.

Decarbonisation is raising the electrical load on mainline alternating-current railway feeders that were not designed for sustained, simultaneous high-power demand. When several trains accelerate together on a shared feeder, the contact-line voltage can fall far enough to trigger rolling-stock current limitation or feeder protection, eroding capacity and reliability. Preventing this in real time requires a quantity conventional operation does not expose: a localised, continuously updated estimate of the traction power available to each train given the live network state. A railway power-flow model, with trains represented under a voltage-dependent automatic current-limitation characteristic, shows that the minimum network voltage is governed by the product of power and distance rather than by power alone, yielding a distance-dependent single-train power envelope. This envelope does not add up when several trains share a feeder, so a conservative pairwise screen is generalised to a solver-free multi-train estimate: a calibrated shared-path voltage model returning the minimum section voltage and the per-train available power for any number of trains. Calibration uses two short offline solver runs, one fixing the self-impedance and one the inter-train coupling through a separation-dependent factor. Its current-limitation behaviour follows EN 50388-1, and on matched multi-train cases the estimate tracks the full power flow to within about nine per cent on average across two-, three-, and four-train cases, improving as more trains share the feeder, while its online cost scales with the number of trains rather than the network size.

Marton Laszlo Ambrus

The decarbonisation of heavy-duty railway networks requires maximising the capacity of existing electrical infrastructure. Integrating heavy freight alongside fast passenger services exposes the hard physical limits of conventional AC traction networks, causing severe localised power quality degradation, phase unbalance, and low-voltage behaviour that triggers protective substation tripping. Because upgrading physical hardware is highly capital-intensive, software-based Energy Management Strategies (EMS) have the potential to offer viable solution for preventing these power capacity challenges. This systematic review demonstrates that traditional, single-train optimisations are fundamentally "grid-blind", necessitating a shift toward multi-train simulations to protect the network's Firm Service Capacity (FSC). However, evaluating this shift reveals a critical tension between the computational bottlenecks of deterministic models and the latency of heuristic approaches. Furthermore, a fundamental operational gap exists: while current algorithms generate theoretically optimal speed profiles to increase efficiency and therefore reduce power consumption from the grid, these profiles are excessively complex and inappropriate for human execution. Consequently, future EMS frameworks must bridge this human-machine interface gap to realise capacity improvements on constrained mixed-traffic networks.