Vansh Ramani

Vansh Ramani, Shourya Vir Jain

The scaling exponent $α$ in neural scaling laws $L(N) \propto N^{-α}$ is commonly treated as a fixed constant set by architecture and data. We present evidence that $α$ depends systematically on the optimizer. In controlled random-feature regression experiments -- the canonical theoretical framework for neural scaling -- we measure $α$ across five optimizer variants and six spectral conditions. Preconditioned optimizers consistently yield steeper scaling (larger $α$), with the $α$-shift increasing across most of the tested spectral range, peaking near $s = 1.5$, and remaining large at $s = 2.0$. At $s \approx 1.0$ (characteristic of natural language), the full natural gradient achieves $α\approx 0.31$ versus $α\approx 0.12$ for gradient descent -- a $2.6\times$ larger fitted exponent that, within the random-feature model, compounds with each model-size doubling. Whether and how this exponent shift transfers to large-scale LLM training -- where recent evidence suggests the advantage may attenuate with scale -- remains an important open question. Our results imply that scaling-law forecasts should account for optimizer choice, and we provide a spectral diagnostic predicting when advanced optimizers will pay off.

Mridul Gupta, Samyak Jain, Vansh Ramani et al.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are powerful tools for learning from graph-structured data, but their scalability is increasingly strained by the size of real-world graphs in domains like recommender systems, fraud detection, and molecular biology. Graph condensation -- the task of generating a smaller synthetic graph that retains the performance of models trained on the original -- has emerged as a promising solution. However, the dominant approach of gradient matching introduces a fundamental contradiction: it requires training on the full dataset to create the compressed version, thereby undermining the goal of efficiency. Worse still, these methods suffer from high computational overhead, poor generalization across GNN architectures, and brittle reliance on specific model configurations. Equally concerning is the community's reliance on misleading evaluation protocols such as node compression ratios, which fail to reflect true resource savings, condensation overhead, and illusory application to neural architecture search. These shortcomings are not incidental -- they are systemic, and they obstruct meaningful progress. In this position paper, we argue that graph condensation, in its current form, needs a reset. We call for moving beyond full-dataset training and model-dependent design, and instead advocate for methods that are lightweight, architecture-agnostic, and practically deployable. By identifying key methodological flaws and outlining concrete research directions, we aim to reorient the field toward approaches that deliver on the true promise of condensation: efficient, generalizable, and usable GNN training at scale.

Mridul Gupta, Samyak Jain, Vansh Ramani et al.

Graph condensation has emerged as a promising avenue to enable scalable training of GNNs by compressing the training dataset while preserving essential graph characteristics. Our study uncovers significant shortcomings in current graph condensation techniques. First, the majority of the algorithms paradoxically require training on the full dataset to perform condensation. Second, due to their gradient-emulating approach, these methods require fresh condensation for any change in hyperparameters or GNN architecture, limiting their flexibility and reusability. Finally, they fail to achieve substantial size reduction due to synthesizing fully-connected, edge-weighted graphs. To address these challenges, we present Bonsai, a novel graph condensation method empowered by the observation that \textit{computation trees} form the fundamental processing units of message-passing GNNs. Bonsai condenses datasets by encoding a careful selection of \textit{exemplar} trees that maximize the representation of all computation trees in the training set. This unique approach imparts Bonsai as the first linear-time, model-agnostic graph condensation algorithm for node classification that outperforms existing baselines across $7$ real-world datasets on accuracy, while being $22$ times faster on average. Bonsai is grounded in rigorous mathematical guarantees on the adopted approximation strategies making it robust to GNN architectures, datasets, and parameters.

Vansh Ramani, Alexis Schlomer, Akash Nayar et al.

Approximate Nearest-Neighbor Search (ANNS) efficiently finds data items whose embeddings are close to that of a given query in a high-dimensional space, aiming to balance accuracy with speed. Used in recommendation systems, image and video retrieval, natural language processing, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), ANNS algorithms such as IVFPQ, HNSW graphs, Annoy, and MRPT utilize graph, tree, clustering, and quantization techniques to navigate large vector spaces. Despite this progress, ANNS systems spend up to 99% of query time to compute distances in their final refinement phase. In this paper, we present PANORAMA, a machine learning-driven approach that tackles the ANNS verification bottleneck through data-adaptive learned orthogonal transforms that facilitate the accretive refinement of distance bounds. Such transforms compact over 90% of signal energy into the first half of dimensions, enabling early candidate pruning with partial distance computations. We integrate PANORAMA into state-of-the-art ANNS methods, namely IVFPQ/Flat, HNSW, MRPT, and Annoy, without index modification, using level-major memory layouts, SIMD-vectorized partial distance computations, and cache-aware access patterns. Experiments across diverse datasets -- from image-based CIFAR-10 and GIST to modern embedding spaces including OpenAI's Ada 2 and Large 3 -- demonstrate that PANORAMA affords a 2--30$\times$ end-to-end speedup with no recall loss.