Christoph M. Wintersteiger

Philip Lederer, Carl-Martin Pfeiler, Christoph Wintersteiger et al.

We consider the discretization of a stationary Stokes interface problem in a velocity-pressure formulation. The interface is described implicitly as the zero level of a scalar function as it is common in level set based methods. Hence, the interface is not aligned with the mesh. An unfitted finite element discretization based on a Taylor-Hood velocity-pressure pair and an XFEM (or CutFEM) modification is used for the approximation of the solution. This allows for the accurate approximation of solutions which have strong or weak discontinuities across interfaces which are not aligned with the mesh. To arrive at a consistent, stable and accurate formulation we require several additional techniques. First, a Nitsche-type formulation is used to implement interface conditions in a weak sense. Secondly, we use the ghost penalty stabilization to obtain an inf-sup stable variational formulation. Finally, for the highly accurate approximation of the implicitly described geometry, we use a combination of a piecewise linear interface reconstruction and a parametric mapping of the underlying mesh. We introduce the method and discuss results of numerical examples.

Andrew Fitzgibbon, Christoph M. Wintersteiger, Jeffrey Sarnoff

The IEEE P3109 draft standard defines a parameterized family of binary floating-point formats and associated operations, with a focus on facilitating machine learning. These formats allow efficient and consistent representation of values in a small number of bits. The defined formats are parameterized over width and precision in bits, signedness, and the presence of infinities. Operations are defined by decoding floating-point values to the set of closed extended reals: the reals augmented with positive and negative infinity and NaN (Not a Number). Explicit treatment of NaN and infinite operands ensures that only real arithmetic is invoked in operation definitions. Extensive rounding and saturation modes are defined; stochastic rounding is included. Operations are exception-free, accelerating throughput, with exceptional situations communicated through return values, e.g., NaN. Operations on blocks of values sharing a common scale factor are defined in terms of the underlying operations in a uniform manner. System vendors may describe approximate implementations via a novel scale-invariant measure, akin to units in the last place, called kappa-approximation. Standard function definitions and various other properties are mechanically verified and generated using formal specifications.

Aleksandar Zeljic, Peter Backeman, Christoph M. Wintersteiger et al.

We consider the problem of solving floating-point constraints obtained from software verification. We present UppSAT --- a new implementation of a systematic approximation refinement framework [ZWR17] as an abstract SMT solver. Provided with an approximation and a decision procedure (implemented in an off-the-shelf SMT solver), UppSAT yields an approximating SMT solver. Additionally, UppSAT includes a library of predefined approximation components which can be combined and extended to define new encodings, orderings and solving strategies. We propose that UppSAT can be used as a sandbox for easy and flexible exploration of new approximations. To substantiate this, we explore several approximations of floating-point arithmetic. Approximations can be viewed as a composition of an encoding into a target theory, a precision ordering, and a number of strategies for model reconstruction and precision (or approximation) refinement. We present encodings of floating-point arithmetic into reduced precision floating-point arithmetic, real-arithmetic, and fixed-point arithmetic (encoded in the theory of bit-vectors). In an experimental evaluation, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of approximating solvers obtained by combining various encodings and decision procedures (based on existing state-of-the-art SMT solvers for floating-point, real, and bit-vector arithmetic).

Edward Zulkoski, Ruben Martins, Christoph Wintersteiger et al.

Over the years complexity theorists have proposed many structural parameters to explain the surprising efficiency of conflict-driven clause-learning (CDCL) SAT solvers on a wide variety of large industrial Boolean instances. While some of these parameters have been studied empirically, until now there has not been a unified comparative study of their explanatory power on a comprehensive benchmark. We correct this state of affairs by conducting a large-scale empirical evaluation of CDCL SAT solver performance on nearly 7000 industrial and crafted formulas against several structural parameters such as backdoors, treewidth, backbones, and community structure. Our study led us to several results. First, we show that while such parameters only weakly correlate with CDCL solving time, certain combinations of them yield much better regression models. Second, we show how some parameters can be used as a "lens" to better understand the efficiency of different solving heuristics. Finally, we propose a new complexity-theoretic parameter, which we call learning-sensitive with restarts (LSR) backdoors, that extends the notion of learning-sensitive (LS) backdoors to incorporate restarts and discuss algorithms to compute them. We mathematically prove that for certain class of instances minimal LSR-backdoors are exponentially smaller than minimal-LS backdoors.