Gianmarco Gurioli

NA
h-index10
3papers
30citations
Novelty32%
AI Score33

3 Papers

1.2NAJul 13, 2018
Spectrally Accurate Energy-preserving Methods for the Numerical Solution of the "Good" Boussinesq Equation

Luigi Brugnano, Gianmarco Gurioli, Chengjian Zhang

In this paper we study the geometric solution of the so called "good" Boussinesq equation. This goal is achieved by using a convenient space semi-discretization, able to preserve the corresponding Hamiltonian structure, then using energy-conserving Runge-Kutta methods in the HBVM class for the time integration. Numerical tests are reported, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed method.

1.2NAMar 6
A Multi-Order Extension of Fractional HBVMs (FHBVMs)

Luigi Brugnano, Gianmarco Gurioli, Felice Iavernaro et al.

The efficient numerical solution of fractional differential equations has been recently tackled through the definition of Fractional HBVMs (FHBVMs), a class of Runge-Kutta type methods. Corresponding Matlab (c) codes have been also made available on the internet, proving to be very competitive w.r.t. existing ones. However, so far, FHBVMs have been given for solving systems of fractional differential equations with the same order of fractional derivative, whereas the numerical solution of multi-order problems (i.e., problems in which different orders of fractional derivatives occur) has not been handled, yet. Due to their relevance in applications, in this paper we propose an extension of FHBVMs for addressing fractional multi-order problems, providing full details for such an approach. A corresponding Matlab (c) code, handling the case of two different fractional orders, is also made available, proving very effective for numerically solving these problems.

10.1OCNov 9, 2018
Adaptive Regularization Algorithms with Inexact Evaluations for Nonconvex Optimization

S. Bellavia, G. Gurioli, B. Morini et al.

A regularization algorithm using inexact function values and inexact derivatives is proposed and its evaluation complexity analyzed. This algorithm is applicable to unconstrained problems and to problems with inexpensive constraints (that is constraints whose evaluation and enforcement has negligible cost) under the assumption that the derivative of highest degree is $β$-Hölder continuous. It features a very flexible adaptive mechanism for determining the inexactness which is allowed, at each iteration, when computing objective function values and derivatives. The complexity analysis covers arbitrary optimality order and arbitrary degree of available approximate derivatives. It extends results of Cartis, Gould and Toint (2018) on the evaluation complexity to the inexact case: if a $q$th order minimizer is sought using approximations to the first $p$ derivatives, it is proved that a suitable approximate minimizer within $ε$ is computed by the proposed algorithm in at most $O(ε^{-\frac{p+β}{p-q+β}})$ iterations and at most $O(|\log(ε)|ε^{-\frac{p+β}{p-q+β}})$ approximate evaluations. An algorithmic variant, although more rigid in practice, can be proved to find such an approximate minimizer in $O(|\log(ε)|+ε^{-\frac{p+β}{p-q+β}})$ evaluations.While the proposed framework remains so far conceptual for high degrees and orders, it is shown to yield simple and computationally realistic inexact methods when specialized to the unconstrained and bound-constrained first- and second-order cases. The deterministic complexity results are finally extended to the stochastic context, yielding adaptive sample-size rules for subsampling methods typical of machine learning.