Geraud Krawezik

Siavash Golkar, Jake Kovalic, Irina Espejo Morales et al.

Biological function emerges from coupled constraints across sequence, structure, regulation, evolution, and cellular context, yet most foundation models in biology are trained within one modality or for a fixed forward task. We present MIMIC, a generative multimodal foundation model trained on our newly curated and aligned dataset, LORE, linking nucleic acid, protein, evolutionary, structural, regulatory, and semantic/contextual modalities within partially observed biomolecular states. MIMIC uses a split-track encoder-decoder architecture to condition on arbitrary subsets of observed modalities and reconstruct or generate missing components of molecular state across the genome, transcriptome, and proteome. Multimodal conditioning consistently improves MIMIC's sequence reconstruction relative to sequence-only inputs, while its learned representations enable state-of-the-art performance on RNA and protein downstream tasks. MIMIC achieves state-of-the-art splicing prediction, and its joint generative formulation enables isoform-aware inference that further improves performance. Beyond prediction, the same generative framework supports constrained design. For RNA, MIMIC identifies corrective edits in a clinically relevant HBB splice-disrupting mutation without reverting it by using evolutionary and structural signals. For proteins, jointly conditioning on shape and surface chemistry of PD-L1 and hACE2 binding sites produces diverse, high-confidence sequences with strong in silico support for target binding. Finally, MIMIC uses experimental context as semantic conditioning to model assay-dependent RNA chemical probing, rather than treating context as a fixed output. Together, these results position MIMIC's aligned multimodal generative modeling as a strong foundation for unifying representation learning, conditional prediction, and constrained biomolecular design within a single model.

Payel Mukhopadhyay, Stefan S. Nixon, Romain Watteaux et al.

Whether physics foundation models can be usefully deployed on laboratory experiments remains an open question for scientific machine learning (ML). We test this question on the Rayleigh-Taylor instability (RTI), a ubiquitous and demanding fluid instability seen from tabletop flows to supernova explosions, in which small perturbations at a density interface grow into chaotic, multiscale mixing as a lighter fluid accelerates into a heavier one. Standard ML models struggle with RTI, and despite over a century of theoretical, numerical, and experimental work, it carries an unresolved discrepancy between simulation and experiment: the late-time mixing growth rate, $α$, measured in most laboratory experiments ($\sim$ 0.06-0.07), is roughly three times the value from idealized direct numerical simulations (DNS, $\sim$ 0.02). The gap's origin remains debated. These properties make RTI a stringent test for a question that matters well beyond RTI: can foundation models trained only on simulations generalise to sparse, messy, and noisy laboratory settings? We finetune Walrus, a foundation model for continuum dynamics, on three or fewer DNS realizations and recover key RTI physics over long rollouts. Applied zero-shot to sliding-barrier laboratory data, the finetuned model leaves the DNS-like regime and enters the observed growth band, having never seen a single experimental sample. These results provide independent, data-driven evidence that initial conditions play a crucial role in the longstanding sim-experiment gap in $α$. The model also generalises zero-shot to stable stratification, a buoyancy regime absent from training, correctly slowing mixing-layer growth. Together, our results show that foundation models can generalise well beyond their training data, predicting laboratory behavior and unseen physical regimes, opening new ways to probe longstanding simulation-experiment gaps.

Irina Espejo Morales, Damon Hinz, Marvin Alberts et al.

Structural elucidation from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) data remains a fundamental bottleneck across chemistry, materials science, and biology. We demonstrate that an agentic AI system can perform this task at a level comparable to graduate-level chemistry students. Instead of training a model to directly map spectra to structures, we build a single autonomous agent, backed by a frozen LLM, that interacts with a curated environment with access to domain-specific processing tools, validation checks, tabulated chemical shifts, and instructions that outline the stepwise nature of a chemist's thinking process. On the Alberts dataset, our agent elucidates structures with a top-1 accuracy of 71%, comparable to the performance of graduate students at 66% top-1 accuracy. On the van Bramer and AstraZeneca datasets, our agent achieved 80% and 20% top-1 accuracy respectively, outperforming zero-shot end-to-end deep learning models which were trained on large datasets of simulated spectra. These results show that reframing NMR elucidation as an LLM-guided constrained search, rather than a modeling task, yields substantial gains and suggests a path toward multi-step orchestration frameworks that integrate a variety of tools, models, and domain knowledge to assist in automating spectroscopic analysis.