Shaowei Shen

Zhang Liu, Shanhao Zhan, Shaowei Shen et al.

Delivering AI-generated content (AIGC) services fundamentally relies on the reasoning capabilities of generative AI (GenAI) models. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) enhances such reasoning by guiding models through intermediate steps, while Tree-of-Thoughts (ToT) further extends CoT by exploring multiple candidate reasoning paths simultaneously, thereby greatly improving AIGC service quality. However, generating diverse reasoning paths requires separate calls to computationally intensive GenAI models, posing significant challenges for resource constrained user devices. In this paper, we investigate mobile edge computing-enabled AIGC service provisioning with ToT prompting. Specifically, using creative writing AIGC tasks as a case study, we first characterize the number of output tokens as a measure of computational resources in GenAI models and establish its relationship with generation delay and quality through experiments with Qwen 2.5-7B-Instruct. Afterward, we introduce a directed acyclic graph (DAG) model to accurately characterize the reasoning process of ToT prompting, where each vertex represents a thought and each directed edge denotes a transition between consecutive thoughts. We then formulate a DAG-based thought assignment problem aimed at minimizing generation delay subject to a user-adjustable quality constraint. To address this problem, we propose a diffusion-based soft actor-critic (DSAC) algorithm that innovatively integrates diffusion models to determine optimal thought assignment decisions. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate that the proposed DSAC achieves total generation delay reductions of up to 8.32% over PPO, 11.57% over SAC, and 36.09% over DDQN across various simulation settings, while reducing latency by over 80% compared to the fully local generation baseline even under stringent quality requirements.

Shaowei Shen, Xiaohong Yang, Jie Yang et al.

Electronic medical records (EMRs), particularly in neurology, are inherently heterogeneous, sparse, and noisy, which poses significant challenges for large language models (LLMs) in clinical diagnosis. In such settings, single-agent systems are vulnerable to self-reinforcing errors, as their predictions lack independent validation and can drift toward spurious conclusions. Although recent multi-agent frameworks attempt to mitigate this issue through collaborative reasoning, their interactions are often shallow and loosely structured, failing to reflect the rigorous, evidence-driven processes used by clinical experts. More fundamentally, existing approaches largely ignore the rich logical dependencies among diseases, such as mutual exclusivity, pathological compatibility, and diagnostic confusion. This limitation prevents them from ruling out clinically implausible hypotheses, even when sufficient evidence is available. To overcome these, we propose RE-MCDF, a relation-enhanced multi-expert clinical diagnosis framework. RE-MCDF introduces a generation--verification--revision closed-loop architecture that integrates three complementary components: (i) a primary expert that generates candidate diagnoses and supporting evidence, (ii) a laboratory expert that dynamically prioritizes heterogeneous clinical indicators, and (iii) a multi-relation awareness and evaluation expert group that explicitly enforces inter-disease logical constraints. Guided by a medical knowledge graph (MKG), the first two experts adaptively reweight EMR evidence, while the expert group validates and corrects candidate diagnoses to ensure logical consistency. Extensive experiments on the neurology subset of CMEMR (NEEMRs) and on our curated dataset (XMEMRs) demonstrate that RE-MCDF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in complex diagnostic scenarios.