Yuya Uezato

Soh Kumabe, Yuya Uezato

ReDoS is a well-known type of algorithmic complexity attack, where an adversary supplies maliciously crafted strings to a regular expression matching engine, aiming to exhaust computational resources of systems. Even quadratic-time behavior in matching engines has been exploited in successful attacks, as exemplified by major outages at Stack Overflow (2016) and Cloudflare (2019). These incidents motivate a fundamental question: Is it possible to construct matching engines that are provably efficient, running in (near-)linear time in the length of the input string? For classical regular expressions (REGEX), Thompson's construction yields a linear-time algorithm. However, practical engines support powerful features such as backreferences, which strictly extend the expressive power of REGEX but unfortunately increase the risk of ReDoS attacks. This paper investigates the fine-grained complexity of the string matching problem for regular expressions with backreferences (REWBs). Specifically, we consider $r$-use $k$-REWBs. On the hardness side, we show that the string matching problem for $k$-REWBs cannot be solved in $O(n^{2k-ε})$ time for any $ε> 0$ under SETH. We also prove that this problem is \textbf{W[2]}-hard when parameterized by the length of the REWB expression, strengthening the previous \textbf{W[1]}-hardness. Moreover, we prove that this problem for $2$-use $2$-REWBs cannot be solved in $n^{1+o(1)}$ time unless the triangle detection problem can be solved in that time. On the algorithmic side, we present an $O(n \log^2 n)$-time algorithm for $1$-use REWBs, which significantly improves upon the recent $O(n^2)$-time algorithm by Nogami and Terauchi (MFCS, 2025). Our algorithm employs several techniques including suffix trees, transition monoids of REGEXes, factorization forest data structures, and periodicity of strings.

Sho Sonoda, Shunta Akiyama, Yuya Uezato

Agentic theorem provers -- pipelines that couple a mathematical reasoning model with library retrieval, subgoal-decomposition/search planner, and a proof assistant verifier -- have recently achieved striking empirical success, yet it remains unclear which components drive performance and why such systems work at all despite classical hardness of proof search. We propose a distributional viewpoint and introduce **statistical provability**, defined as the finite-horizon success probability of reaching a verified proof, averaged over an instance distribution, and formalize modern theorem-proving pipelines as time-bounded MDPs. Exploiting Bellman structure, we prove existence of optimal policies under mild regularity, derive provability certificates via sub-/super-solution inequalities, and bound the performance gap of score-guided planning (greedy/top-\(k\)/beam/rollouts) in terms of approximation error, sequential statistical complexity, representation geometry (metric entropy/doubling structure), and action-gap margin tails. Together, our theory provides a principled, component-sensitive explanation of when and why agentic theorem provers succeed on biased real-world problem distributions, while clarifying limitations in worst-case or adversarial regimes.

Sho Sonoda, Shunta Akiyama, Yuya Uezato

We develop a theoretical analysis of LLM-guided formal theorem proving in interactive proof assistants (e.g., Lean) by modeling tactic proposal as a stochastic policy in a finite-horizon deterministic MDP. To capture modern representation learning, we treat the state and action spaces as general compact metric spaces and assume Lipschitz policies. To explain the gap between worst-case hardness and empirical success, we introduce problem distributions generated by a reference policy $q$, including a latent-variable model in which proofs exhibit reusable cut/lemma/sketch structure represented by a proof DAG. Under a top-$k$ search protocol and Tsybakov-type margin conditions, we derive lower bounds on finite-horizon success probability that decompose into search and learning terms, with learning controlled by sequential Rademacher/covering complexity. Our main separation result shows that when cut elimination expands a DAG of depth $D$ into a cut-free tree of size $Ω(Λ^D)$ while the cut-aware hierarchical process has size $O(λ^D)$ with $λ\llΛ$, a flat (cut-free) learner provably requires exponentially more data than a cut-aware hierarchical learner. This provides a principled justification for subgoal decomposition in recent agentic theorem provers.