Sean White

Shakir Laher, Carla Brackstone, Sara Reis et al.

In recent years, the number of machine learning (ML) technologies gaining regulatory approval for healthcare has increased significantly allowing them to be placed on the market. However, the regulatory frameworks applied to them were originally devised for traditional software, which has largely rule-based behaviour, compared to the data-driven and learnt behaviour of ML. As the frameworks are in the process of reformation, there is a need to proactively assure the safety of ML to prevent patient safety being compromised. The Assurance of Machine Learning for use in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS) methodology was developed by the Assuring Autonomy International Programme based on well-established concepts in system safety. This review has appraised the methodology by consulting ML manufacturers to understand if it converges or diverges from their current safety assurance practices, whether there are gaps and limitations in its structure and if it is fit for purpose when applied to the healthcare domain. Through this work we offer the view that there is clear utility for AMLAS as a safety assurance methodology when applied to healthcare machine learning technologies, although development of healthcare specific supplementary guidance would benefit those implementing the methodology.

Max Parks, Kheli Atluru, Meera Vinod et al.

In this paper, we develop the position that current frameworks for evaluating emotional intelligence (EI) in artificial intelligence (AI) systems need refinement because they do not adequately or comprehensively measure the various aspects of EI relevant in AI. Human EI often involves a phenomenological component and a sense of understanding that artificially intelligent systems lack; therefore, some aspects of EI are irrelevant in evaluating AI systems. However, EI also includes an ability to sense an emotional state, explain it, respond appropriately, and adapt to new contexts (e.g., multicultural), and artificially intelligent systems can do such things to greater or lesser degrees. Several benchmark frameworks specialize in evaluating the capacity of different AI models to perform some tasks related to EI, but these often lack a solid foundation regarding the nature of emotion and what it is to be emotionally intelligent. In this project, we begin by reviewing different theories about emotion and general EI, evaluating the extent to which each is applicable to artificial systems. We then critically evaluate the available benchmark frameworks, identifying where each falls short in light of the account of EI developed in the first section. Lastly, we outline some options for improving evaluation strategies to avoid these shortcomings in EI evaluation in AI systems.