Rajiv Malhotra

Jeremy Cleeman, Kian Agrawala, Rajiv Malhotra

Machine Learning (ML) is of increasing interest for modeling parametric effects in manufacturing processes. But this approach is limited to established processes for which a deep physics-based understanding has been developed over time, since state-of-the-art approaches focus on reducing the experimental and/or computational costs of generating the training data but ignore the inherent and significant cost of developing qualitatively accurate physics-based models for new processes . This paper proposes a transfer learning based approach to address this issue, in which a ML model is trained on a large amount of computationally inexpensive data from a physics-based process model (source) and then fine-tuned on a smaller amount of costly experimental data (target). The novelty lies in pushing the boundaries of the qualitative accuracy demanded of the source model, which is assumed to be high in the literature, and is the root of the high model development cost. Our approach is evaluated for modeling the printed line width in Fused Filament Fabrication. Despite extreme functional and quantitative inaccuracies in the source our approach reduces the model development cost by years, experimental cost by 56-76%, computational cost by orders of magnitude, and prediction error by 16-24%.

Danny Hoang, Anandkumar Patel, Ruimen Chen et al.

Smart manufacturing can significantly improve efficiency and reduce energy consumption, yet the energy demands of AI models may offset these gains. This study utilizes in-situ sensing-based prediction of geometric quality in smart machining to compare the energy consumption, accuracy, and speed of common AI models. HyperDimensional Computing (HDC) is introduced as an alternative, achieving accuracy comparable to conventional models while drastically reducing energy consumption, 200$\times$ for training and 175 to 1000$\times$ for inference. Furthermore, HDC reduces training times by 200$\times$ and inference times by 300 to 600$\times$, showcasing its potential for energy-efficient smart manufacturing.

Ahmadreza Eslaminia, Adrian Jackson, Beitong Tian et al.

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is a widely used additive manufacturing (AM) technique valued for its flexibility and cost-efficiency, with applications in a variety of industries including healthcare and aerospace. Recent developments have made affordable FDM machines accessible and encouraged adoption among diverse users. However, the design, planning, and production process in FDM require specialized interdisciplinary knowledge. Managing the complex parameters and resolving print defects in FDM remain challenging. These technical complexities form the most critical barrier preventing individuals without technical backgrounds and even professional engineers without training in other domains from participating in AM design and manufacturing. Large Language Models (LLMs), with their advanced capabilities in text and code processing, offer the potential for addressing these challenges in FDM. However, existing research on LLM applications in this field is limited, typically focusing on specific use cases without providing comprehensive evaluations across multiple models and tasks. To this end, we introduce FDM-Bench, a benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLMs on FDM-specific tasks. FDM-Bench enables a thorough assessment by including user queries across various experience levels and G-code samples that represent a range of anomalies. We evaluate two closed-source models (GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet) and two open-source models (Llama-3.1-70B and Llama-3.1-405B) on FDM-Bench. A panel of FDM experts assess the models' responses to user queries in detail. Results indicate that closed-source models generally outperform open-source models in G-code anomaly detection, whereas Llama-3.1-405B demonstrates a slight advantage over other models in responding to user queries. These findings underscore FDM-Bench's potential as a foundational tool for advancing research on LLM capabilities in FDM.

Ahmadreza Eslaminia, Chuhan Cai, Cameron Smith et al.

Additive manufacturing (AM) continues to transform modern manufacturing by enabling flexible, on-demand production of complex geometries across diverse industries. Fused filament fabrication (FFF) has extended AM to laboratories, classrooms, and small production environments, but this accessibility shifts process-planning responsibility to users who may lack manufacturing expertise. A syntactically valid slicer profile can still encode thermally or geometrically harmful settings, and subtle G-code edits can alter extrusion, cooling, or adhesion before a print begins. Pre-print G-code screening catches accidental or adversarial machine-program errors before material or machine time is wasted. This paper proposes LLM-ADAM as a generalizable LLM framework for pre-print anomaly detection in AM. The framework decomposes the task into three roles: Extractor-LLM maps a G-code file to a structured process-parameter schema; Reference-LLM converts printer and material documentation into aligned operating ranges; and Judge-LLM interprets a deterministic deviation table and G-code evidence to decide whether a part is non-defective or belongs to an anomaly class. Printers, materials, and LLM backbones are interchangeable test conditions, not fixed assumptions. We evaluate the framework on an N=200 FFF G-code corpus spanning two desktop printer families, two materials, and five classes including non-defective, under-extrusion, over-extrusion, warping, and stringing. The best framework configuration reaches 87.5% accuracy, compared with 59.5% for the strongest engineered single-LLM baseline. The results show that structured decomposition, rather than backbone strength alone, is the dominant source of improvement, with defect classes identified at or near ceiling for leading configurations while residual errors concentrate on conservative false alarms for non-defective samples.

Kiarash Naghavi Khanghah, Anandkumar Patel, Rajiv Malhotra et al.

Conventional predictive modeling of parametric relationships in manufacturing processes is limited by the subjectivity of human expertise and intuition on the one hand and by the cost and time of experimental data generation on the other hand. This work addresses this issue by establishing a new Large Language Model (LLM) framework. The novelty lies in combining automatic extraction of process-relevant knowledge embedded in the literature with iterative model refinement based on a small amount of experimental data. This approach is evaluated on three distinct manufacturing processes that are based on machining, deformation, and additive principles. The results show that for the same small experimental data budget the models derived by our framework have unexpectedly high extrapolative performance, often surpassing the capabilities of conventional Machine Learning. Further, our approach eliminates manual generation of initial models or expertise-dependent interpretation of the literature. The results also reveal the importance of the nature of the knowledge extracted from the literature and the significance of both the knowledge extraction and model refinement components.

Fardin Jalil Piran, Anandkumar Patel, Rajiv Malhotra et al.

Smart manufacturing requires on-device intelligence that meets strict latency and energy budgets. HyperDimensional Computing (HDC) offers a lightweight alternative by encoding data as high-dimensional hypervectors and computing with simple operations. Prior studies often assume that the qualitative relation between HDC hyperparameters and performance is stable across applications. Our analysis of two representative tasks, signal-based quality monitoring in Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machining and image-based defect detection in Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF), shows that this assumption does not hold. We map how encoder type, projection variance, hypervector dimensionality, and data regime shape accuracy, inference latency, training time, and training energy. A formal complexity model explains predictable trends in encoding and similarity computation and reveals nonmonotonic interactions with retraining that preclude a closed-form optimum. Empirically, signals favor nonlinear Random Fourier Features with more exclusive encodings and saturate in accuracy beyond moderate dimensionality. Images favor linear Random Projection, achieve high accuracy with small dimensionality, and depend more on sample count than on dimensionality. Guided by these insights, we tune HDC under multiobjective constraints that reflect edge deployment and obtain models that match or exceed the accuracy of state-of-the-art deep learning and Transformer models while delivering at least 6x faster inference and more than 40x lower training energy. These results demonstrate that domain-aware HDC encoding is necessary and that tuned HDC offers a practical, scalable path to real-time industrial AI on constrained hardware. Future work will enable adaptive encoder and hyperparameter selection, expand evaluation to additional manufacturing modalities, and validate on low-power accelerators.

Kiarash Naghavi Khanghah, Zhiling Chen, Lela Romeo et al.

Additive manufacturing enables the fabrication of complex designs while minimizing waste, but faces challenges related to defects and process anomalies. This study presents a novel multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation-based framework that automates anomaly detection across various Additive Manufacturing processes leveraging retrieved information from literature, including images and descriptive text, rather than training datasets. This framework integrates text and image retrieval from scientific literature and multimodal generation models to perform zero-shot anomaly identification, classification, and explanation generation in a Laser Powder Bed Fusion setting. The proposed framework is evaluated on four L-PBF manufacturing datasets from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, featuring various printer makes, models, and materials. This evaluation demonstrates the framework's adaptability and generalizability across diverse images without requiring additional training. Comparative analysis using Qwen2-VL-2B and GPT-4o-mini as MLLM within the proposed framework highlights that GPT-4o-mini outperforms Qwen2-VL-2B and proportional random baseline in manufacturing anomalies classification. Additionally, the evaluation of the RAG system confirms that incorporating retrieval mechanisms improves average accuracy by 12% by reducing the risk of hallucination and providing additional information. The proposed framework can be continuously updated by integrating emerging research, allowing seamless adaptation to the evolving landscape of AM technologies. This scalable, automated, and zero-shot-capable framework streamlines AM anomaly analysis, enhancing efficiency and accuracy.