Jamison Heard

Rodney A Sanchez, Ferat Sahin, Alex Ororbia et al.

Advancements in reinforcement learning have produced a variety of complex and useful intrinsic driving forces; crucially, these drivers operate under a direct conditioning paradigm. This form of conditioning limits our agents' capacity by restricting how they learn from the environment as well as from others. Off-policy or learn-by-example methods can learn from demonstrators' representations, but they require access to the demonstrating agent's policies or their reward functions. Our work overcomes this direct sampling limitation by introducing vicarious conditioning as an intrinsic reward mechanism. We draw from psychological and biological literature to provide a foundation for vicarious conditioning and use memory-based methods to implement its four steps: attention, retention, reproduction, and reinforcement. Crucially, our vicarious conditioning paradigms support low-shot learning and do not require the demonstrator agent's policy nor its reward functions. We evaluate our approach in the MiniWorld Sidewalk environment, one of the few public environments that features a non-descriptive terminal condition (no reward provided upon agent death), and extend it to Box2D's CarRacing environment. Our results across both environments demonstrate that vicarious conditioning enables longer episode lengths by discouraging the agent from non-descriptive terminal conditions and guiding the agent toward desirable states. Overall, this work emulates a cognitively-plausible learning paradigm better suited to problems such as single-life learning or continual learning.

Laleh Nourian, Anisa Callis, Stephanie Patterson et al.

Moving to a new culture and adapting to a new life, as an international student, can be a stressful experience. In the US, international students face unique overlapping challenges, yet the current support ecosystem, including university support systems and informal social networks, remains largely fragmented. While conversational AI has emerged as a tool used by many (e.g., generative AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Google Gemini), we do not have a clear understanding of how international students adopt and perceive these technologies as support tools. We conducted a survey study (n=60) to map the relationship between international students' challenges and AI adoption patterns, followed by an interview study with 14 participants to identify the underlying motivations and boundaries of use. Our findings show that AI is perceived as a first-aid tool for immediate challenges, however, there is an interest in transforming AI from a tool for short-term help into a long-term support companion. By identifying where and how AI can provide long-term support, and where it is insufficient, we contribute recommendations for creating AI-powered support tailored to the unique needs of international students.

Victor Lockwood, Hasan Mahmud, Mohammad Javad Khojasteh et al.

Human-robot interaction (HRI) evaluation relies almost exclusively on human-completed questionnaires, leaving the robot's perspective unexamined. We propose an \textit{inverted evaluation}, in which LLM-powered robots complete the same standardized instruments from their own perspective, and test whether these ratings agree with human ground truth. In Study~1, five LLMs completed HRI-CUES, Godspeed, and RoSAS questionnaires for 25~interactions ($N = 1{,}522$ evaluations) from the HRI-CUES dataset. LLMs achieved moderate-to-strong agreement on engagement dimensions (satisfaction $r$ up to $.65$ and enjoyment $r$ up to $.72$) with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC $\geq .82$), but \textit{systematically inverted} the comfort/strangeness dimension ($r = -.44$ to $-.67$, all $p < .05$), conflating engagement with comfort. In Study~2, a Nao robot running Claude~Sonnet~4.5 replicated these patterns in live interactions ($N = 4$), including real-time turn-by-turn assessment. The strangeness failure persisted across five models, synthetic controls, and embodied deployment for two participants. We argue that current LLM-based robots lack access to the internal affective states needed to assess constructs like strangeness, and that inverted evaluation requires supplementary modalities (e.g., physiological signals, gaze, proxemics) to move beyond behavioral proxies. These findings establish boundary conditions for using LLMs as interaction evaluators in HRI.