Jovan Stojkovic

Jovan Stojkovic, Chaojie Zhang, Íñigo Goiri et al.

The rapid evolution and widespread adoption of generative large language models (LLMs) have made them a pivotal workload in various applications. Today, LLM inference clusters receive a large number of queries with strict Service Level Objectives (SLOs). To achieve the desired performance, these models execute on power-hungry GPUs causing the inference clusters to consume large amount of energy and, consequently, result in excessive carbon emissions. Fortunately, we find that there is a great opportunity to exploit the heterogeneity in inference compute properties and fluctuations in inference workloads, to significantly improve energy-efficiency. However, such a diverse and dynamic environment creates a large search-space where different system configurations (e.g., number of instances, model parallelism, and GPU frequency) translate into different energy-performance trade-offs. To address these challenges, we propose DynamoLLM, the first energy-management framework for LLM inference environments. DynamoLLM automatically and dynamically reconfigures the inference cluster to optimize for energy and cost of LLM serving under the service's performance SLOs. We show that at a service-level, DynamoLLM conserves 53% energy and 38% operational carbon emissions, and reduces 61% cost to the customer, while meeting the latency SLOs.

Ehsan K. Ardestani, Leonardo Piga, Jovan Stojkovic et al.

The electric power supply for AI data centers is now the most significant bottleneck in the race toward Artificial General Intelligence, surpassing even the constraint of AI accelerator availability. To our knowledge, this paper is the first to describe the end-to-end power management process for a hyper-scale AI datacenter; from early power planning to accommodate next-generation accelerators 6--12 months before their general availability, to tuning power settings after large scale deployment, and finally to dynamic, runtime power management for evolving workloads. We present detailed power measurements for a 150 MW datacenter hosting a cluster of 83K GB200 GPUs. We share insights from building this state-of-the-art AI cluster. We hope this work encourages practitioners across the industry to share their own experiences as well.

JooYoung Park, Kevin Nguetchouang, Jovan Stojkovic et al.

Serverless computing relies on extreme multi-tenancy to remain economically viable, driving providers to rely on virtual machines (VMs) that ensure strong isolation and seamless ecosystem compatibility with the FaaS programming model. However, current architectures tightly couple application processing logic with I/O processing, forcing every VM to duplicate a heavy communication fabric (cloud SDK, RPC, and TCP/IP). Our analysis reveals this duplication consumes over 25% of a function's memory footprint, and may double the CPU cycles in VMs compared to bare-metal execution. While prior systems attempt to solve this using WebAssembly or library OSes, they naively sacrifice ecosystem compatibility, forcing developers to migrate code and dependencies to new languages. We introduce Nexus, a serverless-native KVM-based hypervisor that transparently decouples compute from I/O. Nexus shifts the execution model by intercepting communication fabric at the API boundary and offloading it to an always-on host shared backend via zero-copy shared memory. This removes the heavyweight communication fabric from the guest VM, while preserving the conventional serverless programming model. By structurally separating these domains, Nexus unlocks asynchronous I/O optimizations: overlapping input payload prefetching with VM restoration from a snapshot and writing output payloads back to storage off the critical path. Compared to the production baseline, Nexus reduces overall node-level CPU and memory consumption by up to 44% and 31%, respectively, thus increasing deployment density by 37%. Also, Nexus reduces warm- and cold-start latency by 39% and 10%, respectively, bringing the response time within 20% of that of a WASM-based, ecosystem-incompatible hypervisor.

Jovan Stojkovic, Esha Choukse, Chaojie Zhang et al.

With the ubiquitous use of modern large language models (LLMs) across industries, the inference serving for these models is ever expanding. Given the high compute and memory requirements of modern LLMs, more and more top-of-the-line GPUs are being deployed to serve these models. Energy availability has come to the forefront as the biggest challenge for data center expansion to serve these models. In this paper, we present the trade-offs brought up by making energy efficiency the primary goal of LLM serving under performance SLOs. We show that depending on the inputs, the model, and the service-level agreements, there are several knobs available to the LLM inference provider to use for being energy efficient. We characterize the impact of these knobs on the latency, throughput, as well as the energy. By exploring these trade-offs, we offer valuable insights into optimizing energy usage without compromising on performance, thereby paving the way for sustainable and cost-effective LLM deployment in data center environments.

Jovan Stojkovic, Chaojie Zhang, Íñigo Goiri et al.

The rising demand for generative large language models (LLMs) poses challenges for thermal and power management in cloud datacenters. Traditional techniques often are inadequate for LLM inference due to the fine-grained, millisecond-scale execution phases, each with distinct performance, thermal, and power profiles. Additionally, LLM inference workloads are sensitive to various configuration parameters (e.g., model parallelism, size, and quantization) that involve trade-offs between performance, temperature, power, and output quality. Moreover, clouds often co-locate SaaS and IaaS workloads, each with different levels of visibility and flexibility. We propose TAPAS, a thermal- and power-aware framework designed for LLM inference clusters in the cloud. TAPAS enhances cooling and power oversubscription capabilities, reducing the total cost of ownership (TCO) while effectively handling emergencies (e.g., cooling and power failures). The system leverages historical temperature and power data, along with the adaptability of SaaS workloads, to: (1) efficiently place new GPU workload VMs within cooling and power constraints, (2) route LLM inference requests across SaaS VMs, and (3) reconfigure SaaS VMs to manage load spikes and emergency situations. Our evaluation on a large GPU cluster demonstrates significant reductions in thermal and power throttling events, boosting system efficiency.

Jovan Stojkovic, Chaojie Zhang, Íñigo Goiri et al.

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) has been driving an enormous demand for AI inference infrastructure, mainly powered by high-end GPUs. While these accelerators offer immense computational power, they incur high capital and operational costs due to frequent upgrades, dense power consumption, and cooling demands, making total cost of ownership (TCO) for AI datacenters a critical concern for cloud providers. Unfortunately, traditional datacenter lifecycle management (designed for general-purpose workloads) struggles to keep pace with AI's fast-evolving models, rising resource needs, and diverse hardware profiles. In this paper, we rethink the AI datacenter lifecycle scheme across three stages: building, hardware refresh, and operation. We show how design choices in power, cooling, and networking provisioning impact long-term TCO. We also explore refresh strategies aligned with hardware trends. Finally, we use operation software optimizations to reduce cost. While these optimizations at each stage yield benefits, unlocking the full potential requires rethinking the entire lifecycle. Thus, we present a holistic lifecycle management framework that coordinates and co-optimizes decisions across all three stages, accounting for workload dynamics, hardware evolution, and system aging. Our system reduces the TCO by up to 40\% over traditional approaches. Using our framework we provide guidelines on how to manage AI datacenter lifecycle for the future.