Jorge Mendez-Mendez

Jorge Mendez-Mendez, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Tomás Lozano-Pérez · mit

A robot deployed in a home over long stretches of time faces a true lifelong learning problem. As it seeks to provide assistance to its users, the robot should leverage any accumulated experience to improve its own knowledge and proficiency. We formalize this setting with a novel formulation of lifelong learning for task and motion planning (TAMP), which endows our learner with the compositionality of TAMP systems. Exploiting the modularity of TAMP, we develop a mixture of generative models that produces candidate continuous parameters for a planner. Whereas most existing lifelong learning approaches determine a priori how data is shared across various models, our approach learns shared and non-shared models and determines which to use online during planning based on auxiliary tasks that serve as a proxy for each model's understanding of a state. Our method exhibits substantial improvements (over time and compared to baselines) in planning success on 2D and BEHAVIOR domains.

Vaggelis Dorovatas, Malte Schwerin, Andrew D. Bagdanov et al. · mila

Foundation models have transformed machine learning through large-scale pretraining and increased test-time compute. Despite surpassing human performance in several domains, these models remain fundamentally limited in continuous operation, experience accumulation, and personalization, capabilities that are central to adaptive intelligence. While continual learning research has long targeted these goals, its historical focus on in-weight learning (IWL), i.e., updating a single model's parameters to absorb new knowledge, has rendered catastrophic forgetting a persistent challenge. Our position is that combining the strengths of In-Weight Learning (IWL) and the newly emerged capabilities of In-Context Learning (ICL) through the design of modular memory is the missing piece for continual adaptation at scale. We outline a conceptual framework for modular memory-centric architectures that leverage ICL for rapid adaptation and knowledge accumulation, and IWL for stable updates to model capabilities, charting a practical roadmap toward continually learning agents.

Yoo Sung Jang, Kanchana Ranasinghe, Cristina Mata et al.

Cross-embodiment learning from human demonstrations is hindered by the visual gap between human and robot embodiments. While self-supervised learning (SSL) backbones encode rich inter-class semantics of general objects, we show they fail to establish correspondence between human and robot hands. We propose LACE, a framework that aligns human and robot visual representations in the latent space of these backbones by leveraging correspondences between shared body parts across embodiments as sparse supervision. These annotations can be automatically obtained via forward kinematics, and single robot demonstration is sufficient to train the model. Our semantic alignment loss matches distributions incurred by corresponding features, lifting patch-level supervision to semantic-level alignment, while a Gram loss preserves pretrained feature quality. This alignment enables robot policies to leverage abundant human data when robot demonstrations are scarce: in zero-shot transfer, policies using LACE-DINO outperform those using DINO by a large margin (65\%), with consistent gains in low-data regimes and out-of-distribution environments.

Abe Ejilemele, Jorge Mendez-Mendez

When evaluated in dynamic, open-world situations, neural networks struggle to detect unseen classes. This issue complicates the deployment of continual learners in realistic environments where agents are not explicitly informed when novel categories are encountered. A common family of techniques for detecting novelty relies on thresholds of similarity between observed data points and the data used for training. However, these methods often require manually specifying (ahead of time) the value of these thresholds, and are therefore incapable of adapting to the nature of the data. We propose a new method for automatically selecting these thresholds utilizing a linear search and leave-one-out cross-validation on the ID classes. We demonstrate that this novel method for selecting thresholds results in improved total accuracy on MNIST, Fashion MNIST, and CIFAR-10.

Anh-Quan Pham, Marcel Hussing, Shubhankar P. Patankar et al.

Collecting robotic manipulation data is expensive, making it impractical to acquire demonstrations for the combinatorially large space of tasks that arise in multi-object, multi-robot, and multi-environment settings. While recent generative models can synthesize useful data for individual tasks, they do not exploit the compositional structure of robotic domains and struggle to generalize to unseen task combinations. We propose a semantic compositional diffusion transformer that factorizes transitions into robot-, object-, obstacle-, and objective-specific components and learns their interactions through attention. Once trained on a limited subset of tasks, we show that our model can zero-shot generate high-quality transitions from which we can learn control policies for unseen task combinations. Then, we introduce an iterative self-improvement procedure in which synthetic data is validated via offline reinforcement learning and incorporated into subsequent training rounds. Our approach substantially improves zero-shot performance over monolithic and hard-coded compositional baselines, ultimately solving nearly all held-out tasks and demonstrating the emergence of meaningful compositional structure in the learned representations.

Jorge Mendez-Mendez

Using large language models (LLMs) to solve complex robotics problems requires understanding their planning capabilities. Yet while we know that LLMs can plan on some problems, the extent to which these planning capabilities cover the space of robotics tasks is unclear. One promising direction is to integrate the semantic knowledge of LLMs with the formal reasoning of task and motion planning (TAMP). However, the myriad of choices for how to integrate LLMs within TAMP complicates the design of such systems. We develop 16 algorithms that use Gemini 2.5 Flash to substitute key TAMP components. Our zero-shot experiments across 4,950 problems and three domains reveal that the Gemini-based planners exhibit lower success rates and higher planning times than their engineered counterparts. We show that providing geometric details increases the number of task-planning errors compared to pure PDDL descriptions, and that (faster) non-reasoning LLM variants outperform (slower) reasoning variants in most cases, since the TAMP system can direct the LLM to correct its mistakes.