Wanjun Jiang

Dan Xu, Baofen Zheng, Qianqi Shen et al.

Job seekers often initiate search with short, underspecified queries. At LinkedIn, over 80% of job-related queries contain three or fewer keywords, making accurate user intent inference and relevant job retrieval particularly challenging. We present dynamic facet suggestion (DFS), an interactive query refinement mechanism that facilitates intent disambiguation by surfacing personalized semantic attributes conditioned on the joint user-query context in real time. We propose a policy-grounded, retrieval-augmented ranking framework for facet suggestion, comprising offline taxonomy curation, embedding-based retrieval of top-K candidates, and distilled small language model (SLM) based candidate scoring. The system is optimized for real-time serving via pointwise single-token scoring with batching and prefix caching. Offline evaluation demonstrates high precision for generated suggestions, and online A/B tests show significant improvements in suggestion engagement and job search outcomes.

Ping Liu, Qianqi Shen, Jianqiang Shen et al.

Job-search platforms rely on low-bandwidth query interfaces that often fail to capture the high-dimensional complexity of candidate profiles. We present an end-to-end RLAIF (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback) framework to generate \emph{portable} job search queries, terms that abstract away seeker-specific identifiers while preserving generalizable qualifications. This task introduces a highly adversarial reward surface where policy optimization frequently exploits flaws in LLM-as-judge rubrics, resulting in degenerate verbatim-copying behaviors. We conducted comprehensive empirical experiments to isolate the impact of optimization mechanics against structured reward engineering. Our results demonstrate that for critic-free optimizers, performance is overwhelmingly dictated by robust reward shaping, rendering the specific choice of algorithm largely immaterial. While critic-free per-rollout baseline methods (RLOO and REINFORCE++) natively resist reward-hacking, the group-relative advantage normalization in GRPO appears uniquely sensitive to spurious reward signals, making it disproportionately susceptible to exploitation. We show that introducing a deterministic, rule-based reward floor to correct for rewards assigned to verbatim copying mitigates this failure mode, resulting in a substantial $+0.147$ quality improvement on a cross-family evaluation judge. Ultimately, we show that the training-time reward model inflates performance gains by $2.4\times$, confirming that the training success is fundamentally dependent on enforcing reward-shaping disciplines rather than selecting alternative optimizers.