Sophia N. Wilson

Sophia N. Wilson, Sebastian Mair, Mophat Okinyi et al.

Large-scale data has fuelled the success of frontier artificial intelligence (AI) models over the past decade. This expansion has relied on sustained efforts by large technology corporations to aggregate and curate internet-scale datasets. In this work, we examine the environmental, social, and economic costs of large-scale data in AI through a sustainability lens. We argue that the field is shifting from building models from data to actively creating data for building models. We characterise this transition as hyper-datafication, which marks a critical juncture for the future of frontier AI and its societal impacts. To quantify and contextualise data-related costs, we analyse approximately 550,000 datasets from the Hugging Face Hub, focusing on dataset growth, storage-related energy consumption and carbon footprint, and societal representation using language data. We complement this analysis with qualitative responses from data workers in Kenya to examine the labour involved, including direct employment by big tech corporations and exposure to graphic content. We further draw on external data sources to substantiate our findings by illustrating the global disparity in data centre infrastructure. Our analyses reveal that hyper-datafication does not merely increase resource consumption but systematically redistributes environmental burdens, labour risks, and representational harms toward the Global South, precarious data workers, and under-represented cultures. Thus, we propose Data PROOFS recommendations spanning provenance, resource awareness, ownership, openness, frugality, and standards to mitigate these costs. Our work aims to make visible the often-overlooked costs of data that underpin frontier AI and to stimulate broader debate within the research community and beyond.

Pedram Bakhtiarifard, Sophia N. Wilson, Mahmoud Afifi et al.

Training large-scale deep neural networks (DNNs) is resource-intensive, making model compression a practical necessity. The widely accepted ''learning as compression'' hypothesis posits that training induces structure in network weights, which enables compression. Measuring this structure through Kolmogorov-Chaitin-Solomonoff (KCS) complexity is appealing, but existing estimators based on the Coding Theorem Method (CTM) and the Block Decomposition Method (BDM) are limited to small binary objects and do not scale to modern DNNs. We introduce the Quantized Block Decomposition method (QuBD), which extends algorithmic complexity estimation to any $k$-ary object. QuBD first quantizes the network weights to a finite alphabet, then estimates the KCS complexity by aggregating per bit-plane CTM estimates. We show theoretically that QuBD yields a strictly tighter estimation gap with respect to true KCS complexity than binarization-based methods. Using QuBD, we study how the algorithmic complexity of neural network weights evolves during training, showing that it decreases as models learn, scales with data budget, increases during overfitting, follows the delayed generalization observed during grokking, and correlates with generalization performance. We further show that algorithmic information resides predominantly in the most significant bit-planes, which can serve as a practical diagnostic for determining appropriate post-training quantization levels. This work offers novel insights into learning mechanisms in DNNs by providing the first scalable, tractable estimates of KCS complexity for large, non-binary objects such as DNN weights.

Sophia N. Wilson, Guðrún Fjóla Guðmundsdóttir, Andrew Millard et al.

This position paper argues that the machine learning community must move from preaching to practising data frugality for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) development. For long, progress has been equated with ever-larger datasets, driving remarkable advances but now yielding increasingly diminishing performance gains alongside rising energy use and carbon emissions. While awareness of data frugal approaches has grown, their adoption has remained rhetorical, and data scaling continues to dominate development practice. We argue that this gap between preach and practice must be closed, as continued data scaling entails substantial and under-accounted environmental impacts. To ground our position, we provide indicative estimates of the energy use and carbon emissions associated with the downstream use of ImageNet-1K. We then present empirical evidence that data frugality is both practical and beneficial, demonstrating that coreset-based subset selection can substantially reduce training energy consumption with little loss in accuracy, while also mitigating dataset bias. Finally, we outline actionable recommendations for moving data frugality from rhetorical preach to concrete practice for responsible development of AI.

Sophia N. Wilson, Jens Hesselbjerg Christensen, Raghavendra Selvan

Development of modern deep learning methods has been driven primarily by the push for improving model efficacy (accuracy metrics). This sole focus on efficacy has steered development of large-scale models that require massive resources, and results in considerable carbon footprint across the model life-cycle. In this work, we explore how physics inductive biases can offer useful trade-offs between model efficacy and model efficiency (compute, energy, and carbon). We study a variety of models for spatio-temporal forecasting, a task governed by physical laws and well-suited for exploring different levels of physics inductive bias. We show that embedding physics inductive biases into the model design can yield substantial efficiency gains while retaining or even improving efficacy for the tasks under consideration. In addition to using standard physics-informed spatio-temporal models, we demonstrate the usefulness of more recent models like flow matching as a general purpose method for spatio-temporal forecasting. Our experiments show that incorporating physics inductive biases offer a principled way to improve the efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint of machine learning models. We argue that model efficiency, along with model efficacy, should become a core consideration driving machine learning model development and deployment.