Ashish Vashist

Benjamin Warner, Ratna Sagari Grandhi, Max Kieffer et al.

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) for medical applications remains challenging due to benchmark saturation, limited data accessibility, and insufficient coverage of relevant tasks. Existing suites have either saturated, heavily depend on restricted datasets, or lack comprehensive model coverage. We introduce Medmarks, a fully open-source evaluation suite with 30 benchmarks spanning question answering, information extraction, medical calculations, and open-ended clinical reasoning. We perform a systematic evaluation of 61 models across 71 configurations using verifiable metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge. Our results show that frontier reasoning models (Gemini 3 Pro Preview, GPT-5.1, & GPT-5.2) achieve the highest performance across both benchmarks, most frontier proprietary models are significantly more token efficient than open-weight alternatives, medically fine-tuned models outperform their generalist counterparts, and that models are susceptible to answer-order bias (particularly smaller models and Grok 4). A subset of our evals (Medmarks-T) can be directly used as reinforcement learning environments to post-train LLMs for medical reasoning. Code is available at https://github.com/MedARC-AI/Medmarks

Ashish Vashist, Qiranul Saadiyean, Suresh Sundaram et al.

Foreign Object Debris (FOD) within aircraft fuel tanks presents critical safety hazards including fuel contamination, system malfunctions, and increased maintenance costs. Despite the severity of these risks, there is a notable lack of dedicated datasets for the complex, enclosed environments found inside fuel tanks. To bridge this gap, we present a novel dataset, FOD-S2R, composed of real and synthetic images of the FOD within a simulated aircraft fuel tank. Unlike existing datasets that focus on external or open-air environments, our dataset is the first to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of synthetic data in enhancing the real-world FOD detection performance in confined, closed structures. The real-world subset consists of 3,114 high-resolution HD images captured in a controlled fuel tank replica, while the synthetic subset includes 3,137 images generated using Unreal Engine. The dataset is composed of various Field of views (FOV), object distances, lighting conditions, color, and object size. Prior research has demonstrated that synthetic data can reduce reliance on extensive real-world annotations and improve the generalizability of vision models. Thus, we benchmark several state-of-the-art object detection models and demonstrate that introducing synthetic data improves the detection accuracy and generalization to real-world conditions. These experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of synthetic data in enhancing the model performance and narrowing the Sim2Real gap, providing a valuable foundation for developing automated FOD detection systems for aviation maintenance.

Siddhant Bharadwaj, Ashish Vashist, Fahimul Aleem et al.

Image geolocalization has traditionally been addressed through retrieval-based place recognition or geometry-based visual localization pipelines. Recent advances in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong zero-shot reasoning capabilities across multimodal tasks, yet their performance in geographic inference remains underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of multiple state-of-the-art VLMs for country-level image geolocalization using ground-view imagery only. Instead of relying on image matching, GPS metadata, or task-specific training, we evaluate prompt-based country prediction in a zero-shot setting. The selected models are tested on three geographically diverse datasets to assess their robustness and generalization ability. Our results reveal substantial variation across models, highlighting the potential of semantic reasoning for coarse geolocalization and the limitations of current VLMs in capturing fine-grained geographic cues. This study provides the first focused comparison of modern VLMs for country-level geolocalization and establishes a foundation for future research at the intersection of multimodal reasoning and geographic understanding.

Anas Zafar, Leema Krishna Murali, Ashish Vashist

Recent work shows that text-only reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) can match or outperform image-text RLVR on multimodal medical VQA benchmarks, suggesting current evaluation protocols may fail to measure causal visual dependence. We introduce a counterfactual evaluation framework using real, blank, and shuffled images across four medical VQA benchmarks: PathVQA, PMC-VQA, SLAKE, and VQA-RAD. Beyond accuracy, we measure Visual Reliance Score (VRS), Image Sensitivity (IS), and introduce Hallucinated Visual Reasoning Rate (HVRR) to detect cases where models generate visual claims despite producing image-invariant answers. Our findings reveal that RLVR improves accuracy while degrading visual grounding: text-only RLVR achieves negative VRS on PathVQA (-0.09), performing better with mismatched images, while image-text RLVR reduces image sensitivity to 39.8% overall despite improving accuracy. On VQA-RAD, both variants achieve 63% accuracy through different mechanisms: text-only RLVR retains 81% performance with blank images, while image-text RLVR shows only 29% image sensitivity. Models generate visual claims in 68-74% of responses, yet 38-43% are ungrounded (HVRR). These findings demonstrate that accuracy-only rewards enable shortcut exploitation, and progress requires grounding-aware evaluation protocols and training objectives that explicitly enforce visual dependence.