Xiaocong Zeng

Dongyang Kuang, Zizheng Ma, Yushan Zhang et al.

EEG-based emotion recognition is critical for mental health monitoring and affective brain-computer interfaces, yet existing deep learning approaches often treat emotion classes as isolated labels, ignoring their psychological interdependencies. We propose a graph-regularized learning framework that conceptualizes emotions as nodes in a graph where edges encode proximity based on dimensional emotion theories. We adapt three complementary regularization strategies--Graph Label Smoothing (intuitive soft labeling), Commuting distance on graph via Graph Laplacian (spectral graph theory), and Sliced Wasserstein Distance (optimal transport on graph)--ordered by increasing computational complexity. These strategies penalize model predictions that deviate from the established emotion topology. Our framework is evaluated across three representative backbone architectures: AudioTransformer (pure transformer), Conformer (CNN-transformer hybrid), and DCGNN (causal graph neural network), demonstrating architecture-agnostic benefits. Experiments on SEED-IV (4 classes) and SEED-V (5 classes) datasets show consistent improvements: best case up to +5.42% accuracy and 39% reduction in psychologically implausible misclassifications. Ultimately, our framework help raise the upper bound of performance achievable with standard approaches. Code will be released.

Xiaocong Zeng, Craig Michoski, Yan Pang et al.

In this work, we address the often-overlooked issue of Timescale Dependent Label Inconsistency (TsDLI) in training neural network models for EEG-based human emotion recognition. To mitigate TsDLI and enhance model generalization and explainability, we propose two novel regularization strategies: Local Variation Loss (LVL) and Local-Global Consistency Loss (LGCL). Both methods incorporate classical mathematical principles--specifically, functions of bounded variation and commute-time distances--within a graph theoretic framework. Complementing our regularizers, we introduce a suite of new evaluation metrics that better capture the alignment between temporally local predictions and their associated global emotion labels. We validate our approach through comprehensive experiments on two widely used EEG emotion datasets, DREAMER and DEAP, across a range of neural architectures including LSTM and transformer-based models. Performance is assessed using five distinct metrics encompassing both quantitative accuracy and qualitative consistency. Results consistently show that our proposed methods outperform state-of-the-art baselines, delivering superior aggregate performance and offering a principled trade-off between interpretability and predictive power under label inconsistency. Notably, LVL achieves the best aggregate rank across all benchmarked backbones and metrics, while LGCL frequently ranks the second, highlighting the effectiveness of our framework.