11.9IVFeb 10, 2024
An Optimization Framework for Processing and Transfer Learning for the Brain Tumor SegmentationTianyi Ren, Ethan Honey, Harshitha Rebala et al.
Tumor segmentation from multi-modal brain MRI images is a challenging task due to the limited samples, high variance in shapes and uneven distribution of tumor morphology. The performance of automated medical image segmentation has been significant improvement by the recent advances in deep learning. However, the model predictions have not yet reached the desired level for clinical use in terms of accuracy and generalizability. In order to address the distinct problems presented in Challenges 1, 2, and 3 of BraTS 2023, we have constructed an optimization framework based on a 3D U-Net model for brain tumor segmentation. This framework incorporates a range of techniques, including various pre-processing and post-processing techniques, and transfer learning. On the validation datasets, this multi-modality brain tumor segmentation framework achieves an average lesion-wise Dice score of 0.79, 0.72, 0.74 on Challenges 1, 2, 3 respectively.
13.4IVApr 6, 2025
Here Comes the Explanation: A Shapley Perspective on Multi-contrast Medical Image SegmentationTianyi Ren, Juampablo Heras Rivera, Hitender Oswal et al.
Deep learning has been successfully applied to medical image segmentation, enabling accurate identification of regions of interest such as organs and lesions. This approach works effectively across diverse datasets, including those with single-image contrast, multi-contrast, and multimodal imaging data. To improve human understanding of these black-box models, there is a growing need for Explainable AI (XAI) techniques for model transparency and accountability. Previous research has primarily focused on post hoc pixel-level explanations, using methods gradient-based and perturbation-based apporaches. These methods rely on gradients or perturbations to explain model predictions. However, these pixel-level explanations often struggle with the complexity inherent in multi-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation tasks, and the sparsely distributed explanations have limited clinical relevance. In this study, we propose using contrast-level Shapley values to explain state-of-the-art models trained on standard metrics used in brain tumor segmentation. Our results demonstrate that Shapley analysis provides valuable insights into different models' behavior used for tumor segmentation. We demonstrated a bias for U-Net towards over-weighing T1-contrast and FLAIR, while Swin-UNETR provided a cross-contrast understanding with balanced Shapley distribution.