Kyzyl Monteiro

Kyzyl Monteiro, Ritik Vatsal, Neil Chulpongsatorn et al.

This paper introduces Teachable Reality, an augmented reality (AR) prototyping tool for creating interactive tangible AR applications with arbitrary everyday objects. Teachable Reality leverages vision-based interactive machine teaching (e.g., Teachable Machine), which captures real-world interactions for AR prototyping. It identifies the user-defined tangible and gestural interactions using an on-demand computer vision model. Based on this, the user can easily create functional AR prototypes without programming, enabled by a trigger-action authoring interface. Therefore, our approach allows the flexibility, customizability, and generalizability of tangible AR applications that can address the limitation of current marker-based approaches. We explore the design space and demonstrate various AR prototypes, which include tangible and deformable interfaces, context-aware assistants, and body-driven AR applications. The results of our user study and expert interviews confirm that our approach can lower the barrier to creating functional AR prototypes while also allowing flexible and general-purpose prototyping experiences.

Yuxuan Li, Kyzyl Monteiro, Hirokazu Shirado et al.

Policymakers in domains such as emergency management, public health, and urban planning must make decisions under deep uncertainty, where outcomes depend on how large populations interpret information, coordinate, and adopt over time. Existing tools only partially support this process: tabletop exercises enable collaborative discussion but lack dynamic feedback, while computational simulations capture population dynamics but are designed for offline analysis. We present WhatIf, an interactive system that enables policymakers to steer, inspect, and compare LLM-powered social simulations in real time. Informed by a formative study in emergency preparedness planning, we derive four design requirements for interactive policy simulations: fluid steering, real-time scale, collaborative exploration, and multi-level interpretability. We developed WhatIf guided by these requirements and evaluated it with five preparedness professionals across three disaster evacuation scenarios. Our findings show that participants used the system as a space for iterative branching and comparison rather than evaluating fixed plans; reflected on tacit planning assumptions when agent behavior violated expectations; surfaced previously unrecognized planning vulnerabilities; and grounded their reasoning in inspectable agent-level cases rather than aggregate outputs alone. These findings suggest broader design implications for LLM-powered social simulation systems: designing such systems as interactive, shared reasoning environments -- rather than offline predictive tools -- can better support expert decision-making under deep uncertainty.

Kyzyl Monteiro, Evan Atherton, George Fitzmaurice et al.

Editing particle-system visual effects (VFX) is vital for digital storytelling, but achieving controllable, art-directable results remains challenging due to their multi-dimensional nature. Given a large collection of parameters, users must find the ones relevant to their creative goals -- a task that requires a systematic understanding of the particle system and how parameters map to high-level intents, such as making a fire look angry. Elemental Alchemist is a generative interface that transforms user intent into contextualized controls for semantic editing of particle systems. The system introduces two components: a contextual brush palette that generates tools based on scene context, and a generative control panel that surfaces relevant technical parameters and abstracts them to generate mid-level semantic attributes and high-level conceptual controls. An evaluation with 10 novice and 5 expert VFX practitioners shows the system supported users in translating high-level creative goals into particle system parameters.

Kyzyl Monteiro, Minjung Park, Alexander Ioffrida et al.

Ask ChatGPT about vacation planning, and it may infer your income. Ask it about medication, and it may infer your medical history. Because such inferences can expose more information than users intend to reveal, prior work argues that they are a defining privacy risk of LLM-based systems. Yet prior work has mostly shown that LLMs can make potentially violating inferences, not how users experience those inferences nor what controls users may want governing their use. We built the Reflective Layer, a visualization tool that surfaces example unstated inferences from users' own ChatGPT histories, and used it in a mixed-methods study with 18 regular ChatGPT users evaluating 215 surfaced inferences from their own conversations. Counterintuitively, participants reacted more strongly with curiosity and interest rather than distress and concern. Discomfort arose mainly when inferences felt misrepresentative of the user or misaligned with expected use. Participants were also markedly less comfortable with advertisers and third-party applications using those inferences than with platform providers. These findings suggest that the acceptability of LLM inferences is governed not only by its content, but by context-sensitive norms around how they are generated, retained within the platform, and transmitted beyond it.

Kyzyl Monteiro, Sauvik Das

Developing simple and expressive access controls -- interfaces to specify policies that define who should have access to resources and under what circumstances -- is a longstanding challenge in usable security. We present Sketch-based Access Control (SBAC), a sketch-based, AI-assisted access control authoring system that combines the expressive power of sketching with the interpretive capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to support the interpretation and validation of policy specifications as they are iteratively refined. Through a formative study with 14 participants, we identified three design requirements and developed a human-AI collaborative workflow composed of three stages -- Specify, Analyze, and Test -- enabled by the system's ability to maintain and interpret evolving access control specifications. In a user evaluation with 14 participants grounded in their real-world access control scenarios, we found the system and the workflow helped participants progressively refine initially underspecified preferences into more complete and precise policies -- surfacing gaps they had not anticipated, resolving ambiguities through dialogue, and validating policy behavior through concrete scenarios.

Hao-Ping Lee, Yu-Ju Yang, Matthew Bilik et al.

AI creates and exacerbates privacy risks, yet practitioners lack effective resources to identify and mitigate these risks. We present Privy, a tool that guides practitioners through structured privacy impact assessments to: (i) identify relevant risks in novel AI product concepts, and (ii) propose appropriate mitigations. Privy was shaped by a formative study with 11 practitioners, which informed two versions -- one LLM-powered, the other template-based. We evaluated these two versions of Privy through a between-subjects, controlled study with 24 separate practitioners, whose assessments were reviewed by 13 independent privacy experts. Results show that Privy helps practitioners produce privacy assessments that experts deemed high quality: practitioners identified relevant risks and proposed appropriate mitigation strategies. These effects were augmented in the LLM-powered version. Practitioners themselves rated Privy as being useful and usable, and their feedback illustrates how it helps overcome long-standing awareness, motivation, and ability barriers in privacy work.