Xavier Gonzalez

Xavier Gonzalez, Andrew Warrington, Jimmy T. H. Smith et al.

Transformers and linear state space models can be evaluated in parallel on modern hardware, but evaluating nonlinear RNNs appears to be an inherently sequential problem. Recently, however, Lim et al. '24 developed an approach called DEER, which evaluates nonlinear RNNs in parallel by posing the states as the solution to a fixed-point problem. They derived a parallel form of Newton's method to solve the fixed-point problem and achieved significant speedups over sequential evaluation. However, the computational complexity of DEER is cubic in the state size, and the algorithm can suffer from numerical instability. We address these limitations with two novel contributions. To reduce the computational complexity, we apply quasi-Newton approximations and show they converge comparably to Newton, use less memory, and are faster. To stabilize DEER, we leverage a connection between the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm and Kalman smoothing, which we call ELK. This connection allows us to stabilize Newton's method while using efficient parallelized Kalman smoothing algorithms to retain performance. Through several experiments, we show that these innovations allow for parallel evaluation of nonlinear RNNs at larger scales and with greater stability.

Xavier Gonzalez, Leo Kozachkov, David M. Zoltowski et al.

The rise of parallel computing hardware has made it increasingly important to understand which nonlinear state space models can be efficiently parallelized. Recent advances like DEER (arXiv:2309.12252) or DeepPCR (arXiv:2309.16318) have shown that evaluating a state space model can be recast as solving a parallelizable optimization problem, and sometimes this approach can yield dramatic speed-ups in evaluation time. However, the factors that govern the difficulty of these optimization problems remain unclear, limiting the larger adoption of the technique. In this work, we establish a precise relationship between the dynamics of a nonlinear system and the conditioning of its corresponding optimization formulation. We show that the predictability of a system, defined as the degree to which small perturbations in state influence future behavior, impacts the number of optimization steps required for evaluation. In predictable systems, the state trajectory can be computed in $O((\log T)^2)$ time, where $T$ is the sequence length, a major improvement over the conventional sequential approach. In contrast, chaotic or unpredictable systems exhibit poor conditioning, with the consequence that parallel evaluation converges too slowly to be useful. Importantly, our theoretical analysis demonstrates that for predictable systems, the optimization problem is always well-conditioned, whereas for unpredictable systems, the conditioning degrades exponentially as a function of the sequence length. We validate our claims through extensive experiments, providing practical guidance on when nonlinear dynamical systems can be efficiently parallelized, and highlighting predictability as a key design principle for parallelizable models.

Xavier Gonzalez, E. Kelly Buchanan, Hyun Dong Lee et al.

Harnessing parallelism in seemingly sequential models is a central challenge for modern machine learning. Several approaches have been proposed for evaluating sequential processes in parallel using fixed-point methods, like Newton, Picard, and Jacobi iterations. In this work, we show that these methods can be understood within a common framework based on linear dynamical systems (LDSs), where different iteration schemes arise naturally as approximate linearizations of a nonlinear recursion. This unifying view highlights shared principles behind these techniques and clarifies when particular fixed-point methods are most likely to be effective. By bridging diverse algorithms through the language of LDSs, our framework provides a clearer theoretical foundation for parallelizing sequential models and points toward new opportunities for efficient and scalable computation.

Xavier Gonzalez

Massively parallel hardware (GPUs) and long sequence data have made parallel algorithms essential for machine learning at scale. Yet dynamical systems, like recurrent neural networks and Markov chain Monte Carlo, were thought to suffer from sequential bottlenecks. Recent work showed that dynamical systems can in fact be parallelized across the sequence length by reframing their evaluation as a system of nonlinear equations, which can be solved with Newton's method using a parallel associative scan. However, these parallel Newton methods struggled with limitations, primarily inefficiency, instability, and lack of convergence guarantees. This thesis addresses these limitations with methodological and theoretical contributions, drawing particularly from optimization. Methodologically, we develop scalable and stable parallel Newton methods, based on quasi-Newton and trust-region approaches. The quasi-Newton methods are faster and more memory efficient, while the trust-region approaches are significantly more stable. Theoretically, we unify many fixed-point methods into our parallel Newton framework, including Picard and Jacobi iterations. We establish a linear convergence rate for these techniques that depends on the method's approximation accuracy and stability. Moreover, we give a precise condition, rooted in dynamical stability, that characterizes when parallelization provably accelerates a dynamical system and when it cannot. Specifically, the sign of the Largest Lyapunov Exponent of a dynamical system determines whether or not parallel Newton methods converge quickly. In sum, this thesis unlocks scalable and stable methods for parallelizing sequential computation, and provides a firm theoretical basis for when such techniques will and will not work. This thesis also serves as a guide to parallel Newton methods for researchers who want to write the next chapter in this ongoing story.