Ning Lv

Yizhou Zhang, Ning Lv, Teng Wang et al.

Group relative policy optimization (GRPO) has demonstrated significant potential in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) via reinforcement learning. However, its practical deployment is impeded by an excessively slow training process, primarily attributed to the computationally intensive autoregressive generation of multiple responses per query, which makes the generation phase the primary performance bottleneck. Although speculative decoding presents a promising direction for acceleration, its direct application in GRPO achieves limited speedup under high-concurrency training conditions. To overcome this limitation, we propose a concurrency-aware speculative decoding framework that dynamically adjusts the drafting and verification strategy according to real-time concurrency levels, thereby maximizing the acceleration of the generation process. Furthermore, to address performance degradation arising from distributional drift between the evolving target model and the fixed draft model during training, we introduce an online draft learning mechanism that enables the draft model to continuously adapt using feedback signals from the target model. Experimental results across multiple mathematical reasoning datasets and models demonstrate that the proposed method achieves end-to-end speedups of 2.35x to 2.72x, significantly surpassing baseline approaches in efficiency. The code is available at https://github.com/yedaotian9/GRPO_speculative.

Hao Ye, Jisheng Dang, Junfeng Fang et al.

Recent extensive research has demonstrated that the enhanced reasoning capabilities acquired by models through Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) are primarily concentrated within the rank-1 components. Predicated on this observation, we employed Periodic Rank-1 Substitution and identified a counterintuitive phenomenon: RLVR may exhibit implicit reward overfitting to the training dataset. Specifically, the model can achieve satisfactory performance on the test set even when its rewards remain relatively low during the training process. Furthermore, we characterize three distinct properties of RL training: (1) The effective rank-1 component in RLVR don't maintain other model knowledge except mathematical reasoning capability. (2) RLVR fundamentally functions by optimizing a specific singular spectrum. The distribution of singular values of almost all linear layers in RLVR-trained model behaves like heavy-tailed distribution. (3) the left singular vectors associated with rank-1 components demonstrate a stronger alignment tendency during training, which echoes the discovery that RLVR is optimizing sampling efficiency in essence. Taken together, our findings and analysis further reveal how RLVR shapes model parameters and offer potential insights for improving existing RL paradigms or other training paradigms to implement continual learning.