Karthik Natarajan

OC
h-index22
3papers
6citations
Novelty65%
AI Score29

3 Papers

7.0OCMar 2, 2022
Discrete Optimal Transport with Independent Marginals is #P-Hard

Bahar Taşkesen, Soroosh Shafieezadeh-Abadeh, Daniel Kuhn et al.

We study the computational complexity of the optimal transport problem that evaluates the Wasserstein distance between the distributions of two K-dimensional discrete random vectors. The best known algorithms for this problem run in polynomial time in the maximum of the number of atoms of the two distributions. However, if the components of either random vector are independent, then this number can be exponential in K even though the size of the problem description scales linearly with K. We prove that the described optimal transport problem is #P-hard even if all components of the first random vector are independent uniform Bernoulli random variables, while the second random vector has merely two atoms, and even if only approximate solutions are sought. We also develop a dynamic programming-type algorithm that approximates the Wasserstein distance in pseudo-polynomial time when the components of the first random vector follow arbitrary independent discrete distributions, and we identify special problem instances that can be solved exactly in strongly polynomial time.

2.2OCSep 18, 2022
Pairwise independent correlation gap

Arjun Ramachandra, Karthik Natarajan

In this paper, we introduce the notion of a ``pairwise independent correlation gap'' for set functions with random elements. The pairwise independent correlation gap is defined as the ratio of the maximum expected value of a set function with arbitrary dependence among the elements with fixed marginal probabilities to the maximum expected value with pairwise independent elements with the same marginal probabilities. We show that for any nonnegative monotone submodular set function defined on $n$ elements, this ratio is upper bounded by $4/3$ in the following two cases: (a) $n = 3$ for all marginal probabilities and (b) all $n$ for small marginal probabilities (and similarly large marginal probabilities). This differs from the bound on the ``correlation gap'' which holds with mutual independence and showcases the fundamental difference between pairwise independence and mutual independence. We discuss the implication of the results with two examples and end the paper with a conjecture.

1.2SIOct 24, 2020Code
Correlation Robust Influence Maximization

Louis Chen, Divya Padmanabhan, Chee Chin Lim et al.

We propose a distributionally robust model for the influence maximization problem. Unlike the classic independent cascade model \citep{kempe2003maximizing}, this model's diffusion process is adversarially adapted to the choice of seed set. Hence, instead of optimizing under the assumption that all influence relationships in the network are independent, we seek a seed set whose expected influence under the worst correlation, i.e. the "worst-case, expected influence", is maximized. We show that this worst-case influence can be efficiently computed, and though the optimization is NP-hard, a ($1 - 1/e$) approximation guarantee holds. We also analyze the structure to the adversary's choice of diffusion process, and contrast with established models. Beyond the key computational advantages, we also highlight the extent to which the independence assumption may cost optimality, and provide insights from numerical experiments comparing the adversarial and independent cascade model.