Josu Goikoetxea

Iker De la Iglesia, Iakes Goenaga, Johanna Ramirez-Romero et al.

Evaluating LLM-generated text has become a key challenge, especially in domain-specific contexts like the medical field. This work introduces a novel evaluation methodology for LLM-generated medical explanatory arguments, relying on Proxy Tasks and rankings to closely align results with human evaluation criteria, overcoming the biases typically seen in LLMs used as judges. We demonstrate that the proposed evaluators are robust against adversarial attacks, including the assessment of non-argumentative text. Additionally, the human-crafted arguments needed to train the evaluators are minimized to just one example per Proxy Task. By examining multiple LLM-generated arguments, we establish a methodology for determining whether a Proxy Task is suitable for evaluating LLM-generated medical explanatory arguments, requiring only five examples and two human experts.

J. Goikoetxea, A. Soroa, E. Agirre

Bilingual word embeddings represent words of two languages in the same space, and allow to transfer knowledge from one language to the other without machine translation. The main approach is to train monolingual embeddings first and then map them using bilingual dictionaries. In this work, we present a novel method to learn bilingual embeddings based on multilingual knowledge bases (KB) such as WordNet. Our method extracts bilingual information from multilingual wordnets via random walks and learns a joint embedding space in one go. We further reinforce cross-lingual equivalence adding bilingual con- straints in the loss function of the popular skipgram model. Our experiments involve twelve cross-lingual word similarity and relatedness datasets in six lan- guage pairs covering four languages, and show that: 1) random walks over mul- tilingual wordnets improve results over just using dictionaries; 2) multilingual wordnets on their own improve over text-based systems in similarity datasets; 3) the good results are consistent for large wordnets (e.g. English, Spanish), smaller wordnets (e.g. Basque) or loosely aligned wordnets (e.g. Italian); 4) the combination of wordnets and text yields the best results, above mapping-based approaches. Our method can be applied to richer KBs like DBpedia or Babel- Net, and can be easily extended to multilingual embeddings. All software and resources are open source.

Adrián Cuadrón, Aimar Sagasti, Maitane Urruela et al.

This work presents three different approaches to address the ArchEHR-QA 2025 Shared Task on automated patient question answering. We introduce an end-to-end prompt-based baseline and two two-step methods to divide the task, without utilizing any external knowledge. Both two step approaches first extract essential sentences from the clinical text, by prompt or similarity ranking, and then generate the final answer from these notes. Results indicate that the re-ranker based two-step system performs best, highlighting the importance of selecting the right approach for each subtask. Our best run achieved an overall score of 0.44, ranking 8th out of 30 on the leaderboard, securing the top position in overall factuality.