Erik Larsen

LG
h-index2
4papers
12citations
Novelty11%
AI Score15

4 Papers

1.6LGOct 14, 2021Code
Predicting Solar Flares with Remote Sensing and Machine Learning

Erik Larsen

High energy solar flares and coronal mass ejections have the potential to destroy Earth's ground and satellite infrastructures, causing trillions of dollars in damage and mass human suffering. Destruction of these critical systems would disable power grids and satellites, crippling communications and transportation. This would lead to food shortages and an inability to respond to emergencies. A solution to this impending problem is proposed herein using satellites in solar orbit that continuously monitor the Sun, use artificial intelligence and machine learning to calculate the probability of massive solar explosions from this sensed data, and then signal defense mechanisms that will mitigate the threat. With modern technology there may be only safeguards that can be implemented with enough warning, which is why the best algorithm must be identified and continuously trained with existing and new data to maximize true positive rates while minimizing false negatives. This paper conducts a survey of current machine learning models using open source solar flare prediction data. The rise of edge computing allows machine learning hardware to be placed on the same satellites as the sensor arrays, saving critical time by not having to transmit remote sensing data across the vast distances of space. A system of systems approach will allow enough warning for safety measures to be put into place mitigating the risk of disaster.

1.6LGNov 3, 2021
Intrusion Detection: Machine Learning Baseline Calculations for Image Classification

Erik Larsen, Korey MacVittie, John Lilly

Cyber security can be enhanced through application of machine learning by recasting network attack data into an image format, then applying supervised computer vision and other machine learning techniques to detect malicious specimens. Exploratory data analysis reveals little correlation and few distinguishing characteristics between the ten classes of malware used in this study. A general model comparison demonstrates that the most promising candidates for consideration are Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest Classifier, and Extra Trees Classifier. Convolutional networks fail to deliver their outstanding classification ability, being surpassed by a simple, fully connected architecture. Most tests fail to break 80% categorical accuracy and present low F1 scores, indicating more sophisticated approaches (e.g., bootstrapping, random samples, and feature selection) may be required to maximize performance.

3.1LGOct 14, 2021
A Survey of Machine Learning Algorithms for Detecting Ransomware Encryption Activity

Erik Larsen, David Noever, Korey MacVittie

A survey of machine learning techniques trained to detect ransomware is presented. This work builds upon the efforts of Taylor et al. in using sensor-based methods that utilize data collected from built-in instruments like CPU power and temperature monitors to identify encryption activity. Exploratory data analysis (EDA) shows the features most useful from this simulated data are clock speed, temperature, and CPU load. These features are used in training multiple algorithms to determine an optimal detection approach. Performance is evaluated with accuracy, F1 score, and false-negative rate metrics. The Multilayer Perceptron with three hidden layers achieves scores of 97% in accuracy and F1 and robust data preparation. A random forest model produces scores of 93% accuracy and 92% F1, showing that sensor-based detection is currently a viable option to detect even zero-day ransomware attacks before the code fully executes.

1.4CVJul 1, 2021
Overhead-MNIST: Machine Learning Baselines for Image Classification

Erik Larsen, David Noever, Korey MacVittie et al.

Twenty-three machine learning algorithms were trained then scored to establish baseline comparison metrics and to select an image classification algorithm worthy of embedding into mission-critical satellite imaging systems. The Overhead-MNIST dataset is a collection of satellite images similar in style to the ubiquitous MNIST hand-written digits found in the machine learning literature. The CatBoost classifier, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, and Extreme Gradient Boosting models produced the highest accuracies, Areas Under the Curve (AUC), and F1 scores in a PyCaret general comparison. Separate evaluations showed that a deep convolutional architecture was the most promising. We present results for the overall best performing algorithm as a baseline for edge deployability and future performance improvement: a convolutional neural network (CNN) scoring 0.965 categorical accuracy on unseen test data.