Karan Srivastava

AI
h-index28
3papers
5citations
Novelty38%
AI Score30

3 Papers

MLJun 28, 2022
A Perturbation Bound on the Subspace Estimator from Canonical Projections

Karan Srivastava, Daniel L. Pimentel-Alarcón

This paper derives a perturbation bound on the optimal subspace estimator obtained from a subset of its canonical projections contaminated by noise. This fundamental result has important implications in matrix completion, subspace clustering, and related problems.

LGMar 14, 2025
Generative Modeling for Mathematical Discovery

Jordan S. Ellenberg, Cristofero S. Fraser-Taliente, Thomas R. Harvey et al.

We present a new implementation of the LLM-driven genetic algorithm {\it funsearch}, whose aim is to generate examples of interest to mathematicians and which has already had some success in problems in extremal combinatorics. Our implementation is designed to be useful in practice for working mathematicians; it does not require expertise in machine learning or access to high-performance computing resources. Applying {\it funsearch} to a new problem involves modifying a small segment of Python code and selecting a large language model (LLM) from one of many third-party providers. We benchmarked our implementation on three different problems, obtaining metrics that may inform applications of {\it funsearch} to new problems. Our results demonstrate that {\it funsearch} successfully learns in a variety of combinatorial and number-theoretic settings, and in some contexts learns principles that generalize beyond the problem originally trained on.

AISep 26, 2025
AI Noether -- Bridging the Gap Between Scientific Laws Derived by AI Systems and Canonical Knowledge via Abductive Inference

Karan Srivastava, Sanjeeb Dash, Ryan Cory-Wright et al.

A core goal in modern science is to harness recent advances in AI and computer processing to automate and accelerate the scientific method. Symbolic regression can fit interpretable models to data, but these models often sit outside established theory. Recent systems (e.g., AI Descartes, AI Hilbert) enforce derivability from prior axioms. However, sometimes new data and associated hypotheses derived from data are not consistent with existing theory because the existing theory is incomplete or incorrect. Automating abductive inference to close this gap remains open. We propose a solution: an algebraic geometry-based system that, given an incomplete axiom system and a hypothesis that it cannot explain, automatically generates a minimal set of missing axioms that suffices to derive the axiom, as long as axioms and hypotheses are expressible as polynomial equations. We formally establish necessary and sufficient conditions for the successful retrieval of such axioms. We illustrate the efficacy of our approach by demonstrating its ability to explain Kepler's third law and a few other laws, even when key axioms are absent.