C Kim

Sarah Martinson, Lingkai Kong, Cheol Woo Kim et al.

Agent-based simulation is crucial for modeling complex human behavior, yet traditional approaches require extensive domain knowledge and large datasets. In data-scarce healthcare settings where historic and counterfactual data are limited, large language models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative by leveraging broad world knowledge. This study examines an LLM-driven simulation of a maternal mobile health program, predicting beneficiaries' listening behavior when they receive health information via automated messages (control) or live representatives (intervention). Since uncertainty quantification is critical for decision-making in health interventions, we propose an LLM epistemic uncertainty estimation method based on binary entropy across multiple samples. We enhance model robustness through ensemble approaches, improving F1 score and model calibration compared to individual models. Beyond direct evaluation, we take a decision-focused approach, demonstrating how LLM predictions inform intervention feasibility and trial implementation in data-limited settings. The proposed method extends to public health, disaster response, and other domains requiring rapid intervention assessment under severe data constraints. All code and prompts used for this work can be found at https://github.com/sarahmart/LLM-ABS-ARMMAN-prediction.

Eleni Straitouri, Cheol Woo Kim, Milind Tambe

Mathematical optimization is a powerful tool for structured decision-making across domains such as resource allocation and planning. Formulating optimization models faithful to reality, though, remains a significant bottleneck as it typically demands both domain expertise and optimization knowledge that are often scarce. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) promise to bridge this gap, enabling the generation of candidate optimization models from natural language descriptions. However, there is no guarantee that any single LLM-generated model is reliable, and existing approaches that output only one model are therefore risky. In this work, we propose a novel algorithm that generates a portfolio of optimization models, designed to be robust to the limitations of LLMs. Our method exploits the observation that a single LLM can play two distinct roles $\unicode{x2014}$ as a stochastic generator and as a reasoning evaluator $\unicode{x2014}$ and proposes a unified framework that leverages both capabilities in a complementary manner. We provide theoretical guarantees showing that, as long as either the generator or the evaluator is well-aligned with human preferences, the portfolio is guaranteed to contain high-quality candidates, enabling a principled human-in-the-loop process in which a decision-maker can review multiple candidates before committing to one. We further validate our approach empirically, demonstrating strong performance across a range of optimization modeling tasks.

Cheol Woo Kim, Jai Moondra, Shresth Verma et al.

In many real-world applications of reinforcement learning (RL), deployed policies have varied impacts on different stakeholders, creating challenges in reaching consensus on how to effectively aggregate their preferences. Generalized $p$-means form a widely used class of social welfare functions for this purpose, with broad applications in fair resource allocation, AI alignment, and decision-making. This class includes well-known welfare functions such as Egalitarian, Nash, and Utilitarian welfare. However, selecting the appropriate social welfare function is challenging for decision-makers, as the structure and outcomes of optimal policies can be highly sensitive to the choice of $p$. To address this challenge, we study the concept of an $α$-approximate portfolio in RL, a set of policies that are approximately optimal across the family of generalized $p$-means for all $p \in [-\infty, 1]$. We propose algorithms to compute such portfolios and provide theoretical guarantees on the trade-offs among approximation factor, portfolio size, and computational efficiency. Experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in summarizing the policy space induced by varying $p$ values, empowering decision-makers to navigate this landscape more effectively.