4.3ASJul 17, 2020
Streaming ResLSTM with Causal Mean Aggregation for Device-Directed Utterance DetectionXiaosu Tong, Che-Wei Huang, Sri Harish Mallidi et al.
In this paper, we propose a streaming model to distinguish voice queries intended for a smart-home device from background speech. The proposed model consists of multiple CNN layers with residual connections, followed by a stacked LSTM architecture. The streaming capability is achieved by using unidirectional LSTM layers and a causal mean aggregation layer to form the final utterance-level prediction up to the current frame. In order to avoid redundant computation during online streaming inference, we use a caching mechanism for every convolution operation. Experimental results on a device-directed vs. non device-directed task show that the proposed model yields an equal error rate reduction of 41% compared to our previous best model on this task. Furthermore, we show that the proposed model is able to accurately predict earlier in time compared to the attention-based models.
1.6LGSep 6, 2013
Convergence of Nearest Neighbor Pattern Classification with Selective SamplingShaun N. Joseph, Seif Omar Abu Bakr, Gabriel Lugo
In the panoply of pattern classification techniques, few enjoy the intuitive appeal and simplicity of the nearest neighbor rule: given a set of samples in some metric domain space whose value under some function is known, we estimate the function anywhere in the domain by giving the value of the nearest sample per the metric. More generally, one may use the modal value of the m nearest samples, where m is a fixed positive integer (although m=1 is known to be admissible in the sense that no larger value is asymptotically superior in terms of prediction error). The nearest neighbor rule is nonparametric and extremely general, requiring in principle only that the domain be a metric space. The classic paper on the technique, proving convergence under independent, identically-distributed (iid) sampling, is due to Cover and Hart (1967). Because taking samples is costly, there has been much research in recent years on selective sampling, in which each sample is selected from a pool of candidates ranked by a heuristic; the heuristic tries to guess which candidate would be the most "informative" sample. Lindenbaum et al. (2004) apply selective sampling to the nearest neighbor rule, but their approach sacrifices the austere generality of Cover and Hart; furthermore, their heuristic algorithm is complex and computationally expensive. Here we report recent results that enable selective sampling in the original Cover-Hart setting. Our results pose three selection heuristics and prove that their nearest neighbor rule predictions converge to the true pattern. Two of the algorithms are computationally cheap, with complexity growing linearly in the number of samples. We believe that these results constitute an important advance in the art.