Benchmarking Multimodal Knowledge Conflict for Large Multimodal ModelsYifan Jia, Kailin Jiang, Yuyang Liang et al.
Large Multimodal Models(LMMs) face notable challenges when encountering multimodal knowledge conflicts, particularly under retrieval-augmented generation(RAG) frameworks where the contextual information from external sources may contradict the model's internal parametric knowledge, leading to unreliable outputs. However, existing benchmarks fail to reflect such realistic conflict scenarios. Most focus solely on intra-memory conflicts, while context-memory and inter-context conflicts remain largely investigated. Furthermore, commonly used factual knowledge-based evaluations are often overlooked, and existing datasets lack a thorough investigation into conflict detection capabilities. To bridge this gap, we propose MMKC-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate factual knowledge conflicts in both context-memory and inter-context scenarios. MMKC-Bench encompasses three types of multimodal knowledge conflicts and includes 1,573 knowledge instances and 3,381 images across 23 broad types, collected through automated pipelines with human verification. We evaluate three representative series of LMMs on both model behavior analysis and conflict detection tasks. Our findings show that while current LMMs are capable of recognizing knowledge conflicts, they tend to favor internal parametric knowledge over external evidence. We hope MMKC-Bench will foster further research in multimodal knowledge conflict and enhance the development of multimodal RAG systems. The source code is available at https://github.com/MLLMKCBENCH/MLLMKC.
21.1AIAug 4
KnowHal: A Knowledge-Driven Benchmark for Comprehensive Multimodal Hallucination EvaluationRuihan Li, Jiyang Tan, Kailin Jiang et al.
Hallucination remains a critical challenge for developing trustworthy Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). While existing benchmarks mainly focus on entity, attribute, and relation hallucinations, knowledge-related failures are often investigated separately, lacking a unified evaluation framework across different hallucination dimensions. To overcome this, we propose \textbf{KnowHal}, a benchmark that explicitly incorporates knowledge hallucination into multimodal hallucination evaluation spanning four dimensions: entity, attribute, relation, and knowledge. KnowHal constructs paired positive and negative questions over shared images and entities, enabling controlled comparisons among perceptual errors, knowledge-related errors, and false-premise acceptance. The benchmark contains 1,800 samples across 10 domains and 50 categories, constructed through a semi-automated pipeline combining LLM assistance, CLIP-based filtering, and human verification. We evaluate 14 representative MLLMs on KnowHal and conduct extensive analyses. Results show that the knowledge dimension consistently presents the greatest challenge for nearly all evaluated models, while most models exhibit substantial performance degradation on negative questions, revealing limited robustness to false premises. By unifying four hallucination dimensions with paired question design, KnowHal addresses an important gap in existing evaluation frameworks and enables a more comprehensive assessment of hallucinations in MLLMs.
2.3LGMar 26, 2020
Learning transferable and discriminative features for unsupervised domain adaptationYuntao Du, Ruiting Zhang, Xiaowen Zhang et al.
Although achieving remarkable progress, it is very difficult to induce a supervised classifier without any labeled data. Unsupervised domain adaptation is able to overcome this challenge by transferring knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain. Transferability and discriminability are two key criteria for characterizing the superiority of feature representations to enable successful domain adaptation. In this paper, a novel method called \textit{learning TransFerable and Discriminative Features for unsupervised domain adaptation} (TFDF) is proposed to optimize these two objectives simultaneously. On the one hand, distribution alignment is performed to reduce domain discrepancy and learn more transferable representations. Instead of adopting \textit{Maximum Mean Discrepancy} (MMD) which only captures the first-order statistical information to measure distribution discrepancy, we adopt a recently proposed statistic called \textit{Maximum Mean and Covariance Discrepancy} (MMCD), which can not only capture the first-order statistical information but also capture the second-order statistical information in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). On the other hand, we propose to explore both local discriminative information via manifold regularization and global discriminative information via minimizing the proposed \textit{class confusion} objective to learn more discriminative features, respectively. We integrate these two objectives into the \textit{Structural Risk Minimization} (RSM) framework and learn a domain-invariant classifier. Comprehensive experiments are conducted on five real-world datasets and the results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.