А. В. Афонин

h-index25
2papers
2,212citations

2 Papers

2.1HCJun 2, 2023
Sampling and Ranking for Digital Ink Generation on a tight computational budget

Andrei Afonin, Andrii Maksai, Aleksandr Timofeev et al.

Digital ink (online handwriting) generation has a number of potential applications for creating user-visible content, such as handwriting autocompletion, spelling correction, and beautification. Writing is personal and usually the processing is done on-device. Ink generative models thus need to produce high quality content quickly, in a resource constrained environment. In this work, we study ways to maximize the quality of the output of a trained digital ink generative model, while staying within an inference time budget. We use and compare the effect of multiple sampling and ranking techniques, in the first ablation study of its kind in the digital ink domain. We confirm our findings on multiple datasets - writing in English and Vietnamese, as well as mathematical formulas - using two model types and two common ink data representations. In all combinations, we report a meaningful improvement in the recognizability of the synthetic inks, in some cases more than halving the character error rate metric, and describe a way to select the optimal combination of sampling and ranking techniques for any given computational budget.

3.6MLApr 7, 2021
Which Neural Network to Choose for Post-Fault Localization, Dynamic State Estimation and Optimal Measurement Placement in Power Systems?

Andrei Afonin, Michael Chertkov

We consider a power transmission system monitored with Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) placed at significant, but not all, nodes of the system. Assuming that a sufficient number of distinct single-line faults, specifically pre-fault state and (not cleared) post-fault state, are recorded by the PMUs and are available for training, we, first, design a comprehensive sequence of Neural Networks (NNs) locating the faulty line. Performance of different NNs in the sequence, including Linear Regression, Feed-Forward NN, AlexNet, Graphical Convolutional NN, Neural Linear ODE and Neural Graph-based ODE, ordered according to the type and amount of the power flow physics involved, are compared for different levels of observability. Second, we build a sequence of advanced Power-System-Dynamics-Informed and Neural-ODE based Machine Learning schemes trained, given pre-fault state, to predict the post-fault state and also, in parallel, to estimate system parameters. Finally, third, and continuing to work with the first (fault localization) setting we design a (NN-based) algorithm which discovers optimal PMU placement.